Re: [Evolution-hackers] New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-05-23 Thread Milan Crha
Hi, I just committed changes from 'eclient' branch to eds' master branch. This will be part of evolution-data-server 3.1.2. I'll adapt evolution-exchange, evolution-mapi, evolution-groupwise and evolution-couchdb for the API and opening phase changes. Feel free to poke me if you've any

[Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] evolution-ews: implement Exchange categories as evolution labels (read only)

2011-05-23 Thread James Bottomley
This patch is a proof of concept for adding evolution labels to an exchange back end. The outlook categories perform roughly the same function, and evolution even mirrors their colour scheme. This patch allows evolution to fill in the labels from the EWS Category element. That means that any

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] evolution-ews: implement Exchange categories as evolution labels (read only)

2011-05-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:41 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: + + /* this is a mapping from Exchange/Outlook categories to +* evolution labels based on the standard colours */ + const gchar *labels[] = { + Red Category, $Labelimportant, + Orange

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] evolution-ews: implement Exchange categories as evolution labels (read only)

2011-05-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:41 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: This patch ... Hi, could you use Gnome's bugzilla for patch reviews, please? It has couple reasons why: a) bugzilla is meant for that b) bugzilla has integrated tools for patches and their review c) it's easier to follow (broken)

[Evolution-hackers] [libebook] unknown field name warnings

2011-05-23 Thread Christophe Dumez
Hi, I'm currently working on the QtContacts backend for EDS in MeeGo. While testing the backend, I noticed warnings such as: (process:30563): libebook-WARNING **: unknown field name `X-GENDER' (process:30563): libebook-WARNING **: unknown field name `X-EDS-QTCONTACTS-FAVORITE' I realized

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] evolution-ews: implement Exchange categories as evolution labels (read only)

2011-05-23 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:19 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:41 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: + + /* this is a mapping from Exchange/Outlook categories to +* evolution labels based on the standard colours */ + const gchar *labels[] = { +

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] evolution-ews: implement Exchange categories as evolution labels (read only)

2011-05-23 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:21 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:41 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: This patch ... Hi, could you use Gnome's bugzilla for patch reviews, please? Consider this more an RFC requiring feedback than a patch requiring review. James It has

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] evolution-ews: implement Exchange categories as evolution labels (read only)

2011-05-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:08 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: could you use Gnome's bugzilla for patch reviews, please? Consider this more an RFC requiring feedback than a patch requiring review. For Evo-EWS I'm much happier with patches in email anyway. I find it a lot easier to review

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] evolution-ews: implement Exchange categories as evolution labels (read only)

2011-05-23 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:34 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:08 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: could you use Gnome's bugzilla for patch reviews, please? Consider this more an RFC requiring feedback than a patch requiring review. For Evo-EWS I'm much happier

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] evolution-ews: implement Exchange categories as evolution labels (read only)

2011-05-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:46 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: I think you probably need me to get a feel for evolution development initially before you set me loose in the repo ... Why? It's mostly my baby, and I'm a kernel hacker too... :) Incidentally, I presume you use bugzilla for bugs? I