Re: [Evolution-hackers] New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-06-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Di, 2011-06-14 at 07:38 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:08 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: My two cents as a user of these APIs: having to deal with a major API change once is acceptable. Whether it is in 3.2 or 3.4 I don't really care. But having to rewrite code

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-15 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 14:03 +0100, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: [snip] Matthew Barnes wrote: You could probably get away with just using a date stamp instead of random characters for XX. The key is really for each address book to have its own unique ESource ID. The attached patch

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-15 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales
Le mercredi 15 juin 2011 à 13:39 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit : On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 14:03 +0100, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: [snip] Matthew Barnes wrote: You could probably get away with just using a date stamp instead of random characters for XX. The key is really for each

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-15 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 16:04 +0100, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: Right - its D-Bus activated on the newly launched session bus. I am guessing what we'd need is a .service file to point to the e-addressbook-factory binary inside of e-d-s' source directory. We could point the newly launched