Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel no longer depends on libedataserver

2011-11-18 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi everyone. Am Mittwoch 16 November 2011, um 21:38:59 schrieb Matthew Barnes: On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 23:33 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: There is no longer any _technical_ reason why Camel needs to be bundled in the evolution-data-server module. I DO intend to split Camel off at some

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UID in vCard

2011-11-18 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi Patrick, Am Mittwoch 16 November 2011, um 15:55:54 schrieb Patrick Ohly: Hello! [...] On Di, 2011-11-15 at 15:01 +0100, Christian Hilberg wrote: If a new UID is to be created, it is the responsibility of the Kolab client to assign one. The Kolab server itself is unaware to object

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UID in vCard

2011-11-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 11:23 +0100, Christian Hilberg wrote: Am Mittwoch 16 November 2011, um 15:55:54 schrieb Patrick Ohly: Hello! [...] On Di, 2011-11-15 at 15:01 +0100, Christian Hilberg wrote: If a new UID is to be created, it is the responsibility of the Kolab client to assign

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UID in vCard

2011-11-18 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi, Am Freitag 18 November 2011, um 16:53:38 schrieb Patrick Ohly: On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 11:23 +0100, Christian Hilberg wrote: [...] While the E-D-S client (like Evo) might not be interested whether it is a Kolab backend being used, there is still one thing you may wish to consider