[Evolution-hackers] automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution

2006-10-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
-- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution

2006-10-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 23:32 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: 2006/10/15, Patrick Ohly [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * Is someone going to take care of the reported regression or do you need a patch to fix it? Whoever changed the code between 2.6 and 2.8 should be in a better position

[Evolution-hackers] SyncML for mail (was: Re: automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution)

2006-10-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 14:49 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 22:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: I have not mentioned it on this list before, so before I come to the real reason for this email let me introduce it briefly: SyncEvolution[1] is a SyncML client that I wrote

Re: [Evolution-hackers] automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution

2006-10-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2006-10-16 at 19:21 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: * Is someone running Evolution and in particular the Evolution data server under valgrind as part of release testing or regular quality assurance? I know there is performance work in relation with evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution - vcard import problem in 2.8

2006-10-19 Thread Patrick Ohly
On So, 2006-10-15 at 22:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: * Is someone going to take care of the reported regression or do you need a patch to fix it? Whoever changed the code between 2.6 and 2.8 should be in a better position to fix it, so I am a bit reluctant

Re: [Evolution-hackers] sorting out bugs by taking a look at the dup count

2006-10-19 Thread Patrick Ohly
at the code again and add mutex locking where I consider it appropriate. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution

2006-10-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mi, 2006-10-18 at 19:24 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: I found out what the problem is, see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363102 [...] There is a mutex, but none of the CORBA implementation functions lock it. Any suggestions how to fix this? As I said in that issue, several

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Requests

2007-01-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
this might be relevant for this list ;-) -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Question about Groupwise and Memos (see bug 389668)

2007-02-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
for working on this, BTW. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Addressbook Maintainership

2007-05-22 Thread Patrick Ohly
and to keep it nice and shiny! On the other hand, does that mean that I should stop bothering you with reports about problems in the EDS DBus version of libecal, Ross? ;-) -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution

[Evolution-hackers] comma-separation of event CATEGORIES

2007-06-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
which converts between \, and , to work around the issue in existing Evolution versions. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: [Evolution-hackers] comma-separation of event CATEGORIES

2007-07-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 18:28 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: [separator of CATEGORIES \, incompatible with iCalendar 2.0] At first glance there doesn't seem to be an open bug related to this; it still happens with Evolution 2.10. I will open a bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455274

[Evolution-hackers] EDS API calls hang when EDS dies - how to detect that?

2007-09-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
/libebook/EBook.html -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EDS API calls hang when EDS dies - how to detect that?

2007-09-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 22:13 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 22:21 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: I suppose I can call g_signal_connect(ebook, backend-died, mycallback, NULL), then in mycallback print an error and abort the process, right? Aborting the process is a very drastic

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Evolution] New version of the Evo SVN Makefile - patch for Debian Etch

2007-10-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
definitions in .gconf/%gconf-tree.xml. So unless precautions are taken, updating from 2.6.3 to 2.12.1 is a one-way street! -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ CCACHE := SUDO := true prefix := /usr/local/evo-svn distro := debian-etch V := branch := 2.20

[Evolution-hackers] libtool madness: creates *.so*T linked against the wrong libs

2007-11-01 Thread Patrick Ohly
, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] libtool madness: creates *.so*T linked against the wrong libs

2007-11-01 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 17:15 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello, I try to compile Evolution 2.12.x on Debian Etch, using Paul Smith's Makefile. I was successful once, but not anymore. The problem is that libtool --install puts e.g. a libebook.so into my installation directory which was linked

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution-data-server crashes when running syncevolution - poll() called with GPollFD?

2007-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 18:45 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 23:06 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: can someone please comment on: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41 I got Evolution 2.12.x compiled and can reproduce the problem and look

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EDS API calls hang when EDS dies - how to detect that?

2007-11-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 22:21 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Looking at the current libebook API documentation [1] I see a backend-died signal prototype. I don't remember having seen that before - was the signal or its documentation added recently? I suppose I can call g_signal_connect(ebook

[Evolution-hackers] nightly builds of Evolution + testing with SyncEvolution

2008-02-10 Thread Patrick Ohly
in the GNOME Bugzilla or an email to this list? Are there other tests of the EDS API which I should run? If Novel already does regular testing this probably isn't needed. [1] http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de

Re: [Evolution-hackers] nightly builds of Evolution + testing withSyncEvolution

2008-02-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 15:32 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 12:18 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: I wonder whether this regular building and testing is of interest to anybody else? The build script sends out a short summary email which links to full logs for each night; I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] nightly builds of Evolution +testing withSyncEvolution

2008-02-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 09:44 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:55 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: I can run make check after a build. Are all tests going to be run by that? I doubt, if that is kept updated to source. Then how do I run the existing tests instead? -- Bye

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution doesn't honor LC_TIME (and other LC_ variables)

2008-03-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
to see some solution implemented. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

[Evolution-hackers] checking Evolution with valgrind

2008-03-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
void unref(GList *pointer) { if (pointer) { GList *next = pointer; do { g_object_unref(G_OBJECT(next-data)); next = next-next; } while (next); g_list_free(pointer); } } -- Bye, Patrick Ohly

Re: [Evolution-hackers] checking Evolution with valgrind

2008-03-26 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 23:44 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 20:58 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: as part of the nightly testing that I mentioned recently I now also started to run evolution-data-server and the test program under valgrind, including --leak-check=yes

Re: [Evolution-hackers] checking Evolution with valgrind

2008-03-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:03 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 19:33 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: The best is that if you could track it down to Evolution, file a bug with the valgrind traces and CC me there. ... this is exactly what I won't have time for - sorry! I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] checking Evolution with valgrind

2008-03-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 12:32 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 14:46 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: My offer still stands: I could add interested developers to CC of the emails which report nightly test success or failure. I look at the results rather sporadically; this time

[Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
is picked up by distributions unpatched, then we are bound to run into the same problems again end of 2008 and probably also 2009. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft CDO for Microsoft Exchange VERSION:2.0

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-07 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Do, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention? Hmm, it seems didn't, or the people who maintain the Evolution calendar are not reading this list/on vacation/busy. Should I rather lead this discussion in the bug tracker? -- Bye

[Evolution-hackers] detecting new ical memory tracking

2008-04-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
://www.estamos.de/runtests/2008-04-08-10-00/head-evolution-trunk-minimal/6-evolution/ -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2008-04-07 at 23:40 -0600, P Chenthill wrote: On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: One could argue that the sending program is at fault: it could have used a different TZID after changing the timezone definition. Alternatively it could have sent a more complex

Re: [Evolution-hackers] detecting new ical memory tracking

2008-04-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
on Maemo with EDS-DBus, so I care about that. Making it work with that were part of the reason for changing SyncEvolution. Even if you add versioning information to 2.22.x, I still would have to depend on dlsym() tricks to work with older releases. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
. If there are no objections, then I'll try to get working code together when I come back, hopefully before I go on a business trip for two weeks the week after. Time, anyone got some time? -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ /** * This function cleans up VEVENT

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
, but there's not much time this week. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
seem to check for out-of-memory. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ /* * Copyright (C) 2008 Patrick Ohly * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
definition collisions in those cases where no mapping to system timezones is found. In that case the VTIMEZONE needs to be stored with a different TZID and the VEVENT needs to be patched. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-19 Thread Patrick Ohly
in the tracker. Please watch it and reply there if you are interested: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528902 time zone handling insufficient -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] detecting new ical memory tracking

2008-04-20 Thread Patrick Ohly
to that bug again). Please apply or implement some other runtime detection mechanism. These also needs to go into 22.x. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http

[Evolution-hackers] Subversion commit access

2008-05-02 Thread Patrick Ohly
to the Evolution Subversion repository? Who can authorize that? I would continue to discuss patches in the bug tracker, like before. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org

[Evolution-hackers] compile error: GNOME_KEYRING_RESULT_NO_MATCH

2008-05-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=463494 -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

[Evolution-hackers] default bug handling policy

2008-05-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] default bug handling policy

2008-05-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
to gnome-2-22. I'm a bit afraid that this will be forgotten. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] detecting new ical memory tracking

2008-05-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
SyncEvolution useful. I tried both compiling against 2.22.x directly as well as compiling against 2.12 and running with 2.22.x (this is actually now part of the nightly testing). -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ /* * Copyright (C) 2008 Patrick Ohly

[Evolution-hackers] time zone problem: extending API in stable branch?

2008-06-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
calendars or the patch is applied. Quoting Paul Smith, who missed a meeting this spring due to this bug: I have to add my voice to those saying please, please, PLEASE someone fix this complete and utter disaster! -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de

Re: [Evolution-hackers] time zone problem: extending API in stable branch?

2008-06-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
Can you just point us to the right patch, that extends API ? I seem to hit the wrong patch. I dont see any .h changes also. Sorry for the confusion. The patch I pointed to (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=112638) explains the required API version change, not the API extension

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Future of eds bindings

2008-08-19 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 19:30 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 20:18 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Do you plan to do that before replacing Bonobo in the mainline Evolution? Yes, finding out why getchanges() is so damn slow is on the list of things to do. I'm afraid speeding up

[Evolution-hackers] MAPI backend

2008-08-19 Thread Patrick Ohly
of the MAPI development (known issues, current status, etc.)? Are the go-evolution pages kept up-to-date? -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org

[Evolution-hackers] [Bug 499932] Not deleting from e-mail server after specified time

2008-08-26 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello, Can one of the Evolution email hackers have a look at bug 499932 [1]? This has been open since 2.12 and still applies to the latest stable version. I'm affected myself, so I can help debug this if necessary. Thanks! [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499932 -- Bye, Patrick

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Bug 499932] Not deleting from e-mail server after specified time

2008-08-28 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 09:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 19:55 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Can one of the Evolution email hackers have a look at bug 499932 [1]? This has been open since 2.12 and still applies to the latest stable version. I'm affected myself, so I can help

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bug fixing in stable 2.22.x branch

2008-09-01 Thread Patrick Ohly
proposal for inclusion are * 548268: time zone conversion incorrect * 546934: [Exchange Connector] contact change tracking is broken (required by SyncEvolution) * 499932: [Bug 499932] Not deleting from e-mail server after specified time -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bug fixing in stable 2.22.x branch

2008-09-02 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 09:23 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le lundi 01 septembre 2008 à 19:55 +0200, Patrick Ohly a écrit : On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 12:37 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Thanks, I will send out a mail to the list mentioning the critical fixes which have gone in recently

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI backend

2008-09-02 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 20:22 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: I don't have root access, therefore I compiled all the required components (Samba, libmapi, EDS, Evolution) from source. I haven't tried to run it yet. I'm on Exchange 2007 now. Setting up the MAPI backend worked, but I had to patch

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2008-09-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
search/replace or via defines (ugly!). SyncEvolution would work fine without code changes, it'll simply fall back to not freeing the strings. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2008-09-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
with such a modified upstream libical without source code changes. I personally would prefer to avoid step 5 and rather do a search/replace in Evolution, but Chenthill didn't like that. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de

[Evolution-hackers] compile problems with trunk: dolt

2008-09-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
/evolution/evolution-data-server), otherwise users on older systems will not be able to compile - I'm one of them. Patch attached, can file a bug report if that's necessary. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ Index: evolution-data-server/acinclude.m4

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [opensuse-gnome] Evolution 2.22 for Factory

2008-09-20 Thread Patrick Ohly
and simplifies things like backups of just the relevant data. See also the Configuration masquerading Data discussion on the Evo hackers list... -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EDS architecture

2008-09-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

[Evolution-hackers] EDS ABI changes in 2.24?!

2008-10-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
/libebackend.types: Add documentation for new libebackend library. * docs/reference/libedataserver/libedataserver.types: Remove types that have been moved to libebackend. * docs/reference/calendar/libedata-cal/Makefile.am: Add libebackend to the gtk-doc scanner libraries. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EDS ABI changes in 2.24?!

2008-10-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 15:07 +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 10:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Why was it necessary to break backwards compatibility? [...] For reference the bug in question is #465374. If we had linked libedataserver to libebackend we'd still have the same

[Evolution-hackers] concurrent modifications of items in GUI and EDS database

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick Ohly
To allow clients to query whether the backend supports the check I suggest to add a new capability for e_cal_get_static_capability() and e_book_check_static_capabilities(). Any comments? -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Cannot run evolution built using jhbuild

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick Ohly
complicated than the makefile. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Funambol sync from evolution

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick Ohly
? -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] concurrent modifications of items in GUI and EDS database

2009-01-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:10 +0530, Suman Manjunath wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 17:15, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@gmx.de wrote: The plan for change tracking is to get rid of the dependency on e_book_get_changes(). I already stopped using e_cal_get_changes() because it was too inflexible

Re: [Evolution-hackers] concurrent modifications of items in GUI and EDS database

2009-01-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
VEVENTs, but this can be solved: for CALOBJ_MOD_THIS[ANDPRIOR|FUTURE], the LAST-MODIFIED property of the referenced VEVENT is to be compared. For CALOBJ_MOD_ALL the main event is checked. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Funambol sync from evolution

2009-01-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 00:00 +0100, Stefano Canepa wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 23:20 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: It wouldn't be hard to create and install a libsyncevolution.so which contains all the necessary logic to execute a sync. That might be easier than wrapping a command line tool

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Interface Spec for PIM component interoperability

2009-02-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
). -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Command line

2009-03-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
manually. Without further mangling of the git format-patch output mails are then send with the send time stamp equal to the time when the patch was committed to git, which confuses recipients who sort by time. I made this mistake once and then switched to git send-email instead. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly

Re: [Evolution-hackers] concurrent modifications of items in GUI and EDS database

2009-07-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello! Let's pick up this discussion again. When we agree on the API changes, then I'll try to follow up with an implementation for the file backend. On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 13:48 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello Suman! I forgot to ask: do you agree in general with the plan to do atomic

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [timezone problem] Evolution calendar blew transition from CEST to CET

2009-10-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
code: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562028 Fixed by the Scalix developers recently, available in libical 0.44. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Failing to build latest GIT code

2009-11-27 Thread Patrick Ohly
personal Linux installation. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:54 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@gmx.de wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:09 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 01:16 +0530, Chenthill

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 07:50 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:18 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: We are debating the merits of the actual mail storage, not the summary data. I have wiped out folders.db often enough that I won't use Evolution when it switches to storing

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
: excellent choice, sir ;-) Thanks for bringing this up and taking the feedback into account. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Heads-up: EBookBackend/EBook ECalBackend/ECal ongoing API changes

2010-07-01 Thread Patrick Ohly
working on right now. Will that break libebook and libecal APIs? The issue only mentions backends, but the subject of your emails includes EBook and ECal. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Heads-up: EBookBackend/EBook ECalBackend/ECal ongoing API changes

2010-07-01 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:57 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:42 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Will that break libebook and libecal APIs? The issue only mentions backends, but the subject of your emails includes EBook and ECal. Hi, for EBook it is, all the async API

[Evolution-hackers] default calendar reminders

2010-07-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
/calendar/gui/alarm-notify where I would expect it to be used if it was meant to apply to all appointments. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-kolab] Datastructures for calendar data

2010-10-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
-and-time-zones/ -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Rethinking account management

2011-01-26 Thread Patrick Ohly
at a location chose by the user (file://path uri in the current API) Is all of that still going to be possible? How? -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [SyncEvolution] Issues with evolution 2.32 and syncevolution 1.1.1a

2011-02-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
0x77191eb5 in g_main_loop_run () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #13 0x77ffc51f in main (argc=value optimized out, argv=value optimized out) at e-data-book-factory.c:619 -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [SyncEvolution] Issues with evolution 2.32 and syncevolution 1.1.1a

2011-02-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
to the home dir before the migration and try again. Anything that I should watch out for? -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [SyncEvolution] Issues with evolution 2.32 and syncevolution 1.1.1a

2011-02-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello, update after chatting with Matthew... On Mi, 2011-02-16 at 16:59 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Mi, 2011-02-16 at 10:40 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: Unfortunately these keys are stuffed with XML blobs which are difficult to read in Configuration Editor, but if you scroll

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: [MeeGo-dev] migration (back) to EDS]

2011-03-22 Thread Patrick Ohly
whether that is suitable for the tasks that I have in mind (primarily bug triaging/fixing and updates to track upstream). -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Front-end header files for E-D-S libraries

2011-03-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
file change had been done such that a single = 3.0 check is enough I wouldn't mind, but it doesn't seem like 3.0 has a libebook.h (picking just one example). Is there a chance to add the headers to 3.0 before it gets released? If not, then I'd prefer to not make this change. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Front-end header files for E-D-S libraries

2011-03-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mi, 2011-03-23 at 09:05 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 13:42 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: How much of a problem is that in practice? It's getting to be a problem. Seemingly innocent changes to header files break builds in unexpected ways. Here's a common scenario

[Evolution-hackers] EDS improvements for MeeGo

2011-04-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
be good (and probably better) to look into the proposal also here where the upstream EDS developers hang out. Comments and help welcome ;-} -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EDS improvements for MeeGo

2011-04-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Di, 2011-04-05 at 16:26 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@gmx.de wrote: On Di, 2011-04-05 at 13:06 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@gmx.de wrote: Hello! I have

[Evolution-hackers] e_cal_new_system_calendar() - creates a new calendar each time?

2011-04-07 Thread Patrick Ohly
for this issue, and how should it be fixed? -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org

Re: [Evolution-hackers] e_cal_new_system_calendar() - creates a new calendar each time?

2011-04-07 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Do, 2011-04-07 at 10:47 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello! I noticed that in 2.32/MeeGo, e_cal_new_system_calendar() always creates a new calendar, although there is already one. It is defined in gconf as: group uid=1300454894.7178.0@pohly-mobl1 name=On This Computer base_uri=local

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
. Please consider backporting the fixes for e_cal_new_system_*(). They are unusable in 2.32.x but I intended to use them soon in MeeGo. I'm not sure which fixed from the master branch are all needed, I hope Matthew and Milan can provide a list. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Fr, 2011-04-08 at 16:31 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 15:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Do, 2011-04-07 at 11:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-04-28 Thread Patrick Ohly
/pipermail/meego-dev/2011-April/482731.html -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-04-28 Thread Patrick Ohly
version no longer works with new lib)? That's a major pain for people trying to support multiple distros. Please avoid it whenever possible. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-04-28 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Do, 2011-04-28 at 08:17 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 11:56 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: First of all, +1 for rethinking the API. I'd like to suggest that besides modernizing the API we also take this opportunity to move more of EBook/ECal into a common core

[Evolution-hackers] 32 bit IDs in contact file backend

2011-04-28 Thread Patrick Ohly
/qtcontacts-eds [2] https://www.qt.gitorious.org/qt-mobility/contacts/trees/master/plugins/contacts/maemo5 -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ From 65438bd3c4b706535f83304d94b3c018c8899a5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com Date: Fri, 18

[Evolution-hackers] e_cal_remove_object_with_mod() + empty rid: semantic?

2011-05-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
. If there are two events, one with RRULE and one with RECURRENCE-RULE, and both get removed, should there be two entries in objects-removed? I might be misreading my debug logging, but that doesn't seem to happen. Before I dig deeper, I'd like to get some feedback on the expected semantic. -- Bye, Patrick

Re: [Evolution-hackers] e_cal_remove_object_with_mod() + empty rid: semantic?

2011-05-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
. If there are two events, one with RRULE and one with RECURRENCE-RULE, and both get removed, should there be two entries in objects-removed? I've no idea on this. I'm sorry. First things first ;-) Let me fix the removal, then look into this problem here. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o

Re: [Evolution-hackers] (summarize ][) New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-05-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mi, 2011-05-04 at 14:37 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: Hi, I'm getting slightly lost what is left and what is under discussion, thus please let me summarize things here: On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 11:56 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: First of all, +1 for rethinking the API. I'd like to suggest

Re: [Evolution-hackers] e_cal_remove_object_with_mod() + empty rid: semantic?

2011-05-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mi, 2011-05-04 at 09:41 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Mi, 2011-05-04 at 07:50 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: I would expect that with CALOBJ_MOD_THIS it may remove only exact component, for uid + NULL-rid the master object (which implies also all generated instances) and keep all detached

Re: [Evolution-hackers] (summarize ][) New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-05-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
CAL_BACKEND_PROPERTY_DEFAULT_OBJECT Why duplicate the LOADED/ONLINE/READONLY/CACHE_DIR/CAPABILITIES properties? They could be defined as common E_CLIENT_BACKEND_ properties. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 1/2] e_cal_new_system_foo() should create corresponding source in GConf

2011-05-10 Thread Patrick Ohly
this entry when creating a new system address book. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org

  1   2   >