Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution: Taking forward...

2008-09-23 Thread Rob Bradford
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Hello guys, It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a piece of Evolution code object. Permission granted for any pieces i've personally

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EDS ABI changes in 2.24?!

2008-10-04 Thread Rob Bradford
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 10:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello! A user just alerted me of the fact that he cannot use the precompiled SyncEvolution binaries on Ubuntu Intrepid, which ships Evolution 2.24. The reason is that the version of libedataserver was bumped from current/revision/age

[Evolution-hackers] Getting rid of shipped libdb

2008-10-06 Thread Rob Bradford
Since we're at the start of the cycle shall we go ahead and drop the included libdb ? and thus add a formal requirement on using the system version. AFAIK all the distributors ship with using the system version... I've updated the bug #410164 with a patch that makes this change. Regards, Rob

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting rid of shipped libdb

2008-10-06 Thread Rob Bradford
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 22:15 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Rob, IIRC, I had replied to Ross on a similar query, start GNOME 2.24. Still OpenSUSE ships with in-built libdb. I'm not aware of any other distro. JPR, who use to maintain Evolution few years back, gave me the notes on why it

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting rid of shipped libdb

2008-10-07 Thread Rob Bradford
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Oh, My earlier mail had that as a attachment :-) Eeek. Not enough caffeine. ;-) Cheerio, Rob ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting rid of shipped libdb

2008-10-07 Thread Rob Bradford
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 22:15 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Rob, IIRC, I had replied to Ross on a similar query, start GNOME 2.24. Still OpenSUSE ships with in-built libdb. I'm not aware of any other distro. JPR, who use to maintain Evolution few years back, gave me the notes on why it

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting rid of shipped libdb

2008-10-07 Thread Rob Bradford
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 14:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 18:35 +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: Okay. Have you got these details? It would be good to see which of those still apply, etc.. Sure - the original rational here (AFAIR) is quite simple. If you share

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting rid of shipped libdb

2008-10-08 Thread Rob Bradford
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 18:14 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Rob, On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 16:49 +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: Hhh. But. The use case you outlined directly above about where this goes wrong also applies here: Oh. You ran e-d-s on a machine with a version that migrates it to Some

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Rethinking account management

2010-12-19 Thread Rob Bradford
(I'm leaning away from having URI keys, favoring instead URI components  as separate keys from which a complete URI string can be formed.) As someone who's used ESource in the past .. I always found the old way of doing it oh-so-confusing. I even added the following code to dates: