Re: [Evolution-hackers] exchange connector question

2005-11-30 Thread chen
You can do that through Evolution-data-server. There was some discussion regarding communication with EDS, you can find those mail threads here http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2005-October/msg00070.html. thanks, Chenthill. On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 16:21 +0100, Ron Arts wrote:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] HEAD won't build - sed: -e expression #1, char 44: unknown option to `s'

2006-01-15 Thread chen
What is the version of libnotify-devel your using ? - Chenthill. On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 21:27 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 20:20 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 01:33 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: hi lee, Am Freitag, den 06.01.2006, 13:58 -0500 schrieb

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-16 Thread chen
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:54 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@gmx.de wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:09 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 01:16 +0530, Chenthill

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Preconfiguring Evolution with gconftool-2

2009-12-22 Thread chen
=never;soap_port=7191/url/transportdrafts-foldermbox:/home/chen/.evolution/mail/local#Drafts/drafts-foldersent-foldermbox:/home/chen/.evolution/mail/local#Sent/sent-folderauto-cc always=\false\recipients/recipients/auto-ccauto-bcc always=\false\recipients/recipients/auto-bccreceipt-policy policy

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution documentation

2010-01-31 Thread chen
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 17:47 -0500, Shreyas Phadnis wrote: hello all, I just got the latest evolution (from git master) up and running on my machine. I am testing few things specifically with IMAPX performance... is there any documentation on camel and its threading arch... and on IMAPX?

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failure in evolution 2.30.0 (was Re: Patch for Evo 2.30 - size of mail sidebar)

2010-03-30 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:18 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 15:35 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le mardi 30 mars 2010, à 09:18 -0400, Matthew Barnes a écrit : Even better, can we get a macro added to gnome-common that implements this deprecation flag policy, and perhaps

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo and Kolab2 - a fresh attempt

2010-05-26 Thread chen
to ship ? are you going for RHEL / SLED / Ubuntu LTS ? or more community focused distros ? AFAICS the latest enterprise desktops current in late spring will have the underlying O/S deps necessary (GNOME 2.28) to build run the code as of now. Matthew / Chen - we have a general policy

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Base URI for On This Computer

2010-06-09 Thread chen
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 08:56 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 08:41 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: So a local source group with a base URI of: file:///home/mbarnes/.evolution/calendar/local will become: file:///home/mbarnes/.local/share/evolution/calendar

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution 2.30.2 stable release - June 21st

2010-06-14 Thread chen
Hi all, Evolution 2.30.2 stable release is scheduled to be released next week June 21st. Please commit all the important patches to the stable branch from upstream and downstream. Keep in mind that all freezes valid in stable branch gnome-2-30. Thanks, Chenthill.

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - June 16 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-06-14 Thread chen
Hi all, The meeting format goes as follows, * project updates * Discussions on specific bugs, decisions to be made etc. * status updates from everyone Please join the community meeting to share the interesting evolution stuffs your working on and discuss specific issues/doubts while all the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP vs. IMAPX in Evo 2.30--recommendations?

2010-06-29 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 15:22 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: Hi all. I'm wondering if anyone can provide a summary/recommendation for IMAP vs. IMAP+ (IMAPX) in Evo 2.30 (I'm actually building the very latest gnome-2.30 branch from git)? I use a dovecot IMAP server which I don't think supports any

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-kolab] IMAPX and sync- vs. async-Backends

2010-06-30 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 16:14 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hi there, reading about the new IMAPX implementation used by Evo =2.30, I found it stated that Maybe if imapx had come up before, many backends such as groupwise, mapi etc. would have followed this design rather than a sync

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Heads-up: EBookBackend/EBook ECalBackend/ECal ongoing API changes

2010-07-01 Thread chen
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 13:41 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: On Thursday 01 Juli 2010 at 08:58:32 Milan Crha wrote: Hi all, I'm working on a way to be able to report detailed errors from addressbook/calendar backends to UI, so users will be able to see something more sensible than just

Re: [Evolution-hackers] default calendar reminders

2010-07-06 Thread chen
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:33 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello! How is Evolution's Show a reminder some time before every appointment feature meant to be implemented? Is that something that has to be checked each time an appointment is created (in which case SyncEvolution would have to be

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: local cache for offline-work

2010-07-09 Thread chen
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:50 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hi all, in evolution-kolab, we need to provide full offline capabilities for working with Kolab 2 groupware data in offline mode. Evo 2.30 has an offline mode which works for IMAP email. If I understood correctly, email

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: Lifting the veil

2010-07-09 Thread chen
. Perhaps something to dicuss on #evolution (irc.gimp.net) - but it'd be great to have you working in the same git repo IMHO [ not that it's my decision of course - I defer to Matthew/Chen etc. ;-] Certainly aim for hosting your project on git.gnome.org, but I'd still prefer it be split

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: local cache for offline-work

2010-07-09 Thread chen
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 18:25 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: On Friday 09 July 2010 at 18:01:53 chen wrote: [...] Let me try to summarize some pointers for calendar and you could do the same for address-book as well, + Create New ECalBackend for Kolab + Use the camel apis to fetch

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: local cache for offline-work

2010-07-10 Thread chen
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 19:20 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hi Chen, thank you very much for taking time to clarify things! Much appreciated. On Friday 09 July 2010 at 18:43:32 chen wrote: On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 18:25 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: * Does there exist any infrastructure

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: Lifting the veil

2010-07-10 Thread chen
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 14:22 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 10:29 -0600, Sankar P wrote: (oh that out-of-tree Scalix backend is still using flat-file-summary-APIs-oh-wait-lets-ignore-it etc. types) Is evolution-scalix even alive? It hasn't seen a release in over two

Re: [Evolution-hackers] imapx: Avoid running FETCH_NEW_MESSAGES and REFRESH_INFO jobs simultaneously

2010-07-12 Thread chen
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 15:35 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 15:11 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: From 1d1b146e58f918f67ccff93c4fb5388429bf12e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Woodhouse david.woodho...@intel.com Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:11:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH]

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - July 14 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-07-14 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 11:34 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:07 AM, chen pchenth...@novell.com wrote: Hi all, Our this month's community meeting happens on July 14th. This would be the community meeting before GUADEC 2011!! Isn't this supposed to be GUADEC

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-kolab] Datastructures for calendar data

2010-07-14 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 15:36 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hi again, no ideas? Anything? I will summarize some of the DataStructures here which you will be using in the backend, ECalComponent - This holds the calendar event's data in Ical format. It wraps Icalcomponent, but has not

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-kolab] Datastructures for calendar data

2010-07-14 Thread chen
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:23 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:37 +0530, chen wrote: ECalBackendSync - Abstract class from which you would need to subclass kolab backend. (http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CalendarStore) Though only subclass this if you can't handle

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Couple new functions for ECal/EBook

2010-07-19 Thread chen
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 17:27 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 09:10 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: that's a part which should be changed. The ideal way, as I understand it, is to have an ECalBackend function to retrieve a path for attachments, and ECal should ask backend for it,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: hiding IMAP folders

2010-07-20 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 12:20 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hi all, ...still continuing... Kolab makes use of RFC5464 - The IMAP METADATA Extension IMAP folder annotations to differentiate between the various folder types which are handled by Kolab. Remember, anything (Email and PIM

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: hiding IMAP folders

2010-07-20 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 12:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 12:20 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Is it possible to define certain IMAP folders as hidden from within our plugin's EPlugin part? Or is it possible to hide certain IMAP folders (and their subfolders) in any

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Couple new functions for ECal/EBook

2010-07-20 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 06:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 11:21 +0530, chen wrote: Is it required ? Having it in ECalBackendStore simplifies the backend code to form the path based on the type (calendar,tasks,memos) at a single place rather than every backend doing

[Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: Re: Couple new functions for ECal/EBook]

2010-07-20 Thread chen
---BeginMessage--- Migration has been done and I'll submit the patch soon. Regards Punit On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:56 +0530, chen wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 06:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 11:21 +0530, chen wrote: Is it required ? Having it in ECalBackendStore

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - July 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-08-16 Thread chen
Hi, This is first meeting after our GUADEC 2010! There would be some interesting updates during meeting. The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Aug 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-08-16 Thread chen
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 18:20 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:00 PM, chen pchenth...@novell.com wrote: Hi, This is first meeting after our GUADEC 2010! There would be some interesting updates during meeting. The meeting goes as follows, It probably should be Aug

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel IMAPX RFC5464 compliance

2010-08-18 Thread chen
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:30 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hi everyone, On Thursday 05 August 2010 David Woodhouse wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:22 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Now, I would like to know how we should deal with the issue. We (the evolution-kolab developers) could

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution branched for GNOME 2.32

2010-09-13 Thread chen
Hi, The following modules have been branched for GNOME 2.32, gtkhtml, evolution-data-server, evolution and evolution-exchange. The branch is gnome-2-32. Hard code freeze starts from Sep 13 and ends on Sep 27. Please do not commit any patches to gnome-2-32 branch until hard-code freeze ends.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: IMAPX licensing

2010-09-14 Thread chen
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 17:19 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hello again. While working through the IMAPX sources, I noticed that there are three kinds of licenses in the headers for the *.[hc] files of the IMAPX implementation: * GPLv2 * LGPLv2 * {nil} The COPYING file in the E-D-S

[Evolution-hackers] Merging the collaboration providers in a single package

2010-10-18 Thread chen
Hi, We had discussed about merging the collaborative providers such as evolution-exchange, evolution-mapi, groupwise, kolab and evolution-ews (on development) into a single package in previous community meeting. There are certain advantages and some concern areas in it, let me summarize them on

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - oct 20 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-10-19 Thread chen
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Update on EWS plan * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Merging the collaboration providers in a single package

2010-10-19 Thread chen
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:21 -0600, Sankar P wrote: On 10/18/2010 at 07:01 PM, in message 1287408711.3126.11.ca...@localhost.localdomain, Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:10 +0530, chen wrote: The other solution was to maintain all exchange providers

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Nov 17 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-11-15 Thread chen
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Nov 24 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-11-23 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 08:29 +0530, chen wrote: Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates The meeting was post-poned last week since many core developers were on leave. The meeting will happen on Nov 23 during the same time

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-14 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:33 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 04:47 -0700, Vibha Yadav wrote: Evolution is now compilable against gtk3. Please checkout the gtk3 branch for + gtkhtml + evolution-data-server + evolution Awesome! Nice work! +1 :) - Chenthill.

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Dec 22 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-12-21 Thread chen
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Gtk-ERROR **: GTK+ 3 symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in the same process is not supported

2011-02-03 Thread chen
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 13:33 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 12:43 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: Is there a way to determine where I'm mixing GTK 2 3? I'm not aware of a good way. In the past I've had to pick through pkgconfig files to figure out what's dragging it in, but

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - May 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-05-18 Thread chen
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates Check out http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet for more details. - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [EDS PATCHES] ecal item semantic (was: [Fwd: Re: e_cal_remove_object_with_mod() + empty rid: semantic?])

2011-06-05 Thread chen
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 13:41 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello Chenthill! You are the calendar maintainer, right? Do you have some time to review these patches? On this occasion let me add some further explanation of the motivation for this patch series. Can you please attach these patches on

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - June 29 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-06-13 Thread chen
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates Note: As many core developers are on leave during the 3rd and 4th week Wednesday's of this month. We are postponing the meeting to the last Wednesday of this month, June 29. -

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Aug 24 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-08-23 Thread chen
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your