On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 22:50 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> >
> > > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They
> > are up
> > > now, but would be updated ever
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
>
> > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They
> are up
> > now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
> >
> > The nightly builds now have 2.29.6
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
>
> > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They are up
> > now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
> >
> > The nightly builds now have 2.29.6+
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They are up
> now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
>
> The nightly builds now have 2.29.6+ running.
Thanks. I gave it a quick try and it complains that "No
Hello,
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 12:05 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 17:05 +, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > > I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 17:05 +, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715
> >
> > What would be the least risky way to do this?
> >
> > S
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715
>
> What would be the least risky way to do this?
>
> Sorry, I realize this is a pretty basic question for a "hackers" list.
Th
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 19:14 -0800, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > > Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> > > SUSE (11.2)?
> >
> > http://download.o
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> > SUSE (11.2)?
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME://Evolution://snapshots/openSUSE_11.2/
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in the
> past, when I've tried to use packages from openSUSE Factory, it also had
> dependencies on newer versions of the entire gnome stack which was a big
> headache.
Just a quick n
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > Barring that, what would be the best way to test the current unstable
> > release of Evolution? Should I just compile it from source and run it
> > from my home directory? Again, I fear the list of "dev" package
> > dependencies.
>
> AF
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> SUSE (11.2)?
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME://Evolution://snapshots/openSUSE_11.2/
> I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in th
Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
SUSE (11.2)?
I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in the past,
when I've tried to use packages from openSUSE Factory, it also had
dependencies on newer versions of the entire gnome stack which was a big
13 matches
Mail list logo
