Re: [Evolution-hackers] Largefile support

2008-04-15 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:23 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 13:29 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:43 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:  The only 'gotcha' I can think of by enabling it by default is that it might break ABI if old builds were 32bit

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Largefile support

2008-04-07 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:43 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:  The only 'gotcha' I can think of by enabling it by default is that it might break ABI if old builds were 32bit off_t's (the new off_t's would be 64bit). Oh, and fwiw, looking ahead, it may even be worth changing the public API to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Largefile support

2008-04-07 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 13:29 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:43 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:  The only 'gotcha' I can think of by enabling it by default is that it might break ABI if old builds were 32bit off_t's (the new off_t's would be 64bit). Oh, and fwiw,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Largefile support

2008-04-07 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 13:29 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:43 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:  The only 'gotcha' I can think of by enabling it by default is that it might break ABI if old builds were 32bit off_t's (the new off_t's would be 64bit). Oh, and fwiw,