On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 07:26 +, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> as long as it is not the, sadly common since git migration, raw git log
> output, which is unreadable for downstream, then sure.
Obviously it would be generated from git commit history. What type of
formatting would you prefer?
Be
> I'd like to clean this up in 3.0, so unless I hear objections, after
> we
> branch for GNOME 2.30 I'm going to remove all the ChangeLog* files in
> the evolution, evolution-data-server, evolution-exchange, and gtkhtml
> repositories [1] and replace them with a single top-level ChangeLog
> placeh
Now that we're using Git for source control, our ChangeLog files are
redundant because the content is already available in Git's commit
history.
Worse, the change history we provide in release tarballs is partitioned
across multiple ChangeLog files in the source tree, making it difficult
to search
