Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port progress update

2011-08-28 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 09:26 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> One thing I can say is that, this will be faster than the earlier >> method, for reason that even when we expand one attachment/mail, we >> rerender the entire mail and remember

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port progress update

2011-08-27 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 09:26 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > One thing I can say is that, this will be faster than the earlier > method, for reason that even when we expand one attachment/mail, we > rerender the entire mail and remember their previous states etc which > is sort-a ugly. This approa

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port progress update

2011-08-26 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 17:20 +0200, Dan Vratil wrote: >> as I already mentioned on the IRC meeting, embedding widgets into WebKit >> is broken and I was told that WebKit-Gtk developers intend to drop this >> functionality sooner or later. >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port progress update

2011-08-26 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 17:20 +0200, Dan Vratil wrote: > as I already mentioned on the IRC meeting, embedding widgets into WebKit > is broken and I was told that WebKit-Gtk developers intend to drop this > functionality sooner or later. Citation needed. Xan Lopez said he wasn't aware of any prob

[Evolution-hackers] WebKit port progress update

2011-08-26 Thread Dan Vratil
Hi, as I already mentioned on the IRC meeting, embedding widgets into WebKit is broken and I was told that WebKit-Gtk developers intend to drop this functionality sooner or later. So I decided to go similar way Anjal does, splitting the email display into multiple webviews. To be able to do s