On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 14:12 +, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> is anyone else getting duplicates of this message every few days? This
> has been going on for months and is a bit annoying.
Not me. Maybe it's your local mail server?
Use C-u in Evo (or select View -> Message Source) and look at the
R
is anyone else getting duplicates of this message every few days? This
has been going on for months and is a bit annoying. Is the mailing-list
server looping or what?
Jeff
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello,
>
> did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attenti
On Mi, 2008-04-16 at 13:59 +0530, chenthill palanisamy wrote:
> > I'll create a new bug report. Should we move the discussion away from
> > this list?
>
> I think if we discuss this on IRC, we can conclude on the design
> faster. It would be better to do the patch reviews in bugzilla.
Chenthill
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Patrick Ohly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 13:59 +0530, chenthill palanisamy wrote:
> > > I don't get this part. Can you elaborate what you mean? Are you saying
> > > that storing a VTIMEZONE with TZID=FOO as TZID=FOO 2 when it conflicts
> >
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 13:59 +0530, chenthill palanisamy wrote:
> The VTIMEZONE from libical currently do
> not provide the history of timezone changes (older + current rrules) for
> the system timezones. Libical should be modified so that the VTIMEZONE's
> generated stores the timezone history. The
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 18:07 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 13:59 +0530, chenthill wrote:
> > To preserve the timezone history, the best way would be to store the old
> > rules in VTIMEZONES which should be done in libical.
>
> If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting
Hello,
attached a first revision of the new API call which implements the
mapping of TZIDs to internal ones. I'm currently using (and testing) the
code in SyncEvolution and it works already for some simple test cases.
Some parts are marked as TODO; those will be filled in later. Right now
I just w
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 13:59 +0530, chenthill wrote:
> To preserve the timezone history, the best way would be to store the old
> rules in VTIMEZONES which should be done in libical.
If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting to merge a VTIMEZONE
with TZID=FOO that comes with a new meeting
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 23:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 00:55 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
> [Exchange calendar backend patch]
> > In cases of exchange the old VTIMEZONE and the new VTIMEZONE would have
> > the same tzid, only the rules would be different. All events old and new
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 00:55 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
[Exchange calendar backend patch]
> In cases of exchange the old VTIMEZONE and the new VTIMEZONE would have
> the same tzid, only the rules would be different. All events old and new
> will just use the latest timezone from the backend since the
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 00:42 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Mo, 2008-04-07 at 23:40 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > One could argue that the sending program is at fault: it could have used
> > > a different TZID after changing the timezone
On Mo, 2008-04-07 at 23:40 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > One could argue that the sending program is at fault: it could have used
> > a different TZID after changing the timezone definition. Alternatively
> > it could have sent a more complex
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello,
>
> did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention? Good, please
> keep reading... ;-)
>
> Details can be found in multiple Bugzilla entries, the most important
> one apparently being this one:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello,
>
> did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention? Good, please
> keep reading... ;-)
>
> Details can be found in multiple Bugzilla entries, the most important
> one apparently being this one:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org
On Do, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention?
Hmm, it seems didn't, or the people who maintain the Evolution calendar
are not reading this list/on vacation/busy. Should I rather lead this
discussion in the bug tracker?
--
Bye,
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention? Good,
> please keep reading... ;-)
I will read your email as soon as I get a chance, but I have to add my
voice to those saying "please, please, PLEASE someone fix this complete
and
Hello,
did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention? Good, please
keep reading... ;-)
Details can be found in multiple Bugzilla entries, the most important
one apparently being this one:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301363
Let me summarize the current situation: since
17 matches
Mail list logo