Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: Subclassing and extending IMAPX

2010-09-15 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi, On Thursday 09 September 2010 Christian Hilberg wrote: > [...] > ANNOTATEMORE and METADATA differ in the syntax they use and they have some > minor semantic differences. > [...] Just for your reference: "RFC5464 - The IMAP METADATA Extension" http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc5464.html "IMAP AN

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: Subclassing and extending IMAPX

2010-09-14 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi again, On Thursday 09 September 2010 Christian Hilberg wrote: > [...] > PS.: I will have to check with git-submodule whether we can track just > some part of the E-D-S git with that (i.e. IMAPX) ... if we can > track the full E-D-S git only, then I will have to think up something >

[Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: Subclassing and extending IMAPX

2010-09-09 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi everyone. After some time working on different places within our Plugin, I'm back to our IMAPX part. We would like to use the IMAPX implementation for our backends as well as for the Evolution Email part when Kolab access is configured. Thing is, we cannot just use the plain IMAPX impleme