Re: [Evolution-hackers] massive e-d-s memory leak persuit ...

2008-01-28 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Meeks,

On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:27 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
 Hi Srini,
 
 On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 00:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
  Just check 
  .evolution/addressbook/account/book_name.summary -- Summary which is
  in memory for fast autocompletion
  and
  .evolution/cache/addressbook/account/book_name/cache.db --Acutal
  cache of contacts
 
   I have:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.evolution find -name 'cache.db' -exec ls -lh {} \;
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 25M 2007-12-07 06:14 ./cache/addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Novell GroupWise Address Book/cache.db
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 12K 2007-04-19 16:32 ./cache/addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Frequent Contacts/cache.db
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 12K 2007-04-19 16:32 ./cache/addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Michael Meeks/cache.db
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 21M 2007-04-23 09:44 ./cache/addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Novell GroupWise Address Book/cache.db
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 12K 2008-01-28 11:19 ./cache/addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Frequent Contacts/cache.db
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 22M 2008-01-28 11:19 ./cache/addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Novell GroupWise Address Book/cache.db
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 12K 2008-01-28 11:19 ./cache/addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Michael Meeks/cache.db
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.evolution find -name '*.summary' -exec ls -lh {} \;
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 2.2M 2007-09-06 22:31 ./addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Novell GroupWise Address Book.summary
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 39K 2007-04-19 16:32 ./addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Frequent Contacts.summary
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 1.7M 2007-04-23 10:03 ./addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Novell GroupWise Address Book.summary
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 1.9K 2008-01-28 10:55 ./addressbook/local/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/addressbook.db.summary
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 120K 2008-01-28 11:04 ./addressbook/local/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/addressbook.db.summary
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 289K 2008-01-28 11:07 
 ./addressbook/local/system/addressbook.db.summary
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 39K 2008-01-28 11:19 ./addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Frequent Contacts.summary
 -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 1.7M 2008-01-28 11:17 ./addressbook/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/Novell GroupWise Address Book.summary
 -rw--- 1 michael users 477 2006-07-10 12:29 ./mail/groupwise/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/.summary
 -rw--- 1 michael users 481 2007-01-11 10:03 ./mail/groupwise/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]/.summary
 
  If you see these with groupwise, at times the summary will be more than
  the cache. Which is what the revision fixes. Just check and lemme know.
 
   All my summaries are smaller than the caches it seems.
So I think it is all right for you. I think you must have used
10.3/later, which must have cleared the summary's old contacts.
 
   OTOH, several 20+Mb cache file is quite large, what lurks in there ?
 [ I guess if it's attachments etc. then fair enough, best to use the
 space ].
I guess that it is 6000+ Contacts and their complete addresses/details
like address/phone/etc. It may not have attachments, as the GW didn't
support it iirc.

Novell GroupWise Address Book:
total 24M
-rw-r--r-- 1 sragavan users 24M 2008-01-28 19:16 cache.db

Mine it says 24MB. I doubt, how is that 4MB difference for two people
from the same company. I think mine may have some stale/old contacts.

-Srini
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


[Evolution-hackers] massive e-d-s memory leak persuit ...

2008-01-24 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi dudie,

So - I started to look at the e-d-s memory explosion situation quickly,
took a nice dump from gdb, ran strings on it and the heap has a ton of
strings around the place (as you would expect) - [ currently running at
only ~60Mb

strings /tmp/eds-heap | sort | uniq -c | sort -n 

gives me:

   1666 -CONTACT-UID
   1666 -NAME
   1736 ION-DEST-NAME
   1894 OLUTION-BOOK-URI
   2100 -EMAIL
   2184 ION-DEST-EMAIL
   2318 OLUTION-FILE-AS
   2506 OLUTION-LIST
   2992 ION-LIST
   3058 comp
   3321 OLUTION-DEST-EMAIL
   3329 OLUTION-DEST-CONTACT-UID
   3993 OLUTION-DEST-NAME
   4534 pwise://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Novell GroupWise Address Book
   5343 BEGIN:VCARD
   5372 ION-DEST-EMAIL
   5504 END:VCARD
   5505 VERSION:3.0
   6786 ION-DEST-NAME
   8606 para
  12739 ION-DEST-CONTACT-UID
  13642 OLUTION-DEST-CONTACT-UID
  18082 OLUTION-DEST-NAME
  19252 OLUTION-DEST-EMAIL
  21991 prop
  32508 ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;
  40253 pA,


Where the first column is the count ... 32508 copies of that ATTENDEE
string seems a little excessive, as do the (apparently mangled?)
OLUTION-DEST-... strings.

Does that provide any insight wrt. code to audit for this huge leak ?
apparently it afflicts everything from SLED10-SP1 onwards. Also - in
general to reduce the (high) e-d-s memory usage, should we be using
GQuarks for some of these field names as we store them ?

Thanks,

Michael.

-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] massive e-d-s memory leak persuit ...

2008-01-24 Thread Ross Burton
Michael,

On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 17:46 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
1666 -CONTACT-UID
1666 -NAME
1736 ION-DEST-NAME
1894 OLUTION-BOOK-URI
2100 -EMAIL
2184 ION-DEST-EMAIL
2318 OLUTION-FILE-AS
2506 OLUTION-LIST
2992 ION-LIST
3058 comp
3321 OLUTION-DEST-EMAIL
3329 OLUTION-DEST-CONTACT-UID
3993 OLUTION-DEST-NAME
4534 pwise://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Novell GroupWise Address Book
5343 BEGIN:VCARD
5372 ION-DEST-EMAIL
5504 END:VCARD
5505 VERSION:3.0
6786 ION-DEST-NAME
8606 para
   12739 ION-DEST-CONTACT-UID
   13642 OLUTION-DEST-CONTACT-UID
   18082 OLUTION-DEST-NAME
   19252 OLUTION-DEST-EMAIL
   21991 prop

The majority of those are from the contacts component, but because they
are truncated in some form I think they are left overs from previous
allocations.  I thought I'd fixed all of the major leaks in the
addressbook libraries, but maybe some new ones got introduced.  That
said the ATTENDEE field is from the calendar part, which I have never
really looked at.

If you can replicate this massive memory usage, could you run e-d-s in
massif?

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www: http://www.burtonini.com./
 PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] massive e-d-s memory leak persuit ...

2008-01-24 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hey Michael,

We are aware of some situations (I did that in addressbook) where the
memory built up can happen. They were fixed later to SLED/SP1 release
during late 2.12 and aren't in SLED but are part of trunk already.
Candidate for the next support pack. Chen is doing a extensive job of
profiling EDS currently for SLED/2.22 releases. 

Once thing is that the Groupwise Addressbook cache, on a update,
wouldn't clear the previous one and just appends everything. Which means
if you have 100 and you have a update of 10. Next time your cache would
have 210 where as ideally it should have just 110. Just to see, if this
is a culprit for you. Just move the
.evolution/cache/addressbook/account/Novell GroupWise Address Book

some where else and make it resync (showdown evo/eds and start evo and
go to addressbook). If the sizes vary a lot, they are affected by that
syndrome. There were quite a few bits like these they were fixed post
SP1 and are in trunk/2.12 already.

GQuarks seems to be a nice idea. I will look at it in some time. Thanks
Meeks.

-Srini.


On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 17:46 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
 Hi dudie,
 
   So - I started to look at the e-d-s memory explosion situation quickly,
 took a nice dump from gdb, ran strings on it and the heap has a ton of
 strings around the place (as you would expect) - [ currently running at
 only ~60Mb
 
 strings /tmp/eds-heap | sort | uniq -c | sort -n 
 
 gives me:
 
1666 -CONTACT-UID
1666 -NAME
1736 ION-DEST-NAME
1894 OLUTION-BOOK-URI
2100 -EMAIL
2184 ION-DEST-EMAIL
2318 OLUTION-FILE-AS
2506 OLUTION-LIST
2992 ION-LIST
3058 comp
3321 OLUTION-DEST-EMAIL
3329 OLUTION-DEST-CONTACT-UID
3993 OLUTION-DEST-NAME
4534 pwise://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Novell GroupWise Address Book
5343 BEGIN:VCARD
5372 ION-DEST-EMAIL
5504 END:VCARD
5505 VERSION:3.0
6786 ION-DEST-NAME
8606 para
   12739 ION-DEST-CONTACT-UID
   13642 OLUTION-DEST-CONTACT-UID
   18082 OLUTION-DEST-NAME
   19252 OLUTION-DEST-EMAIL
   21991 prop
   32508 ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;
   40253 pA,
 
 
   Where the first column is the count ... 32508 copies of that ATTENDEE
 string seems a little excessive, as do the (apparently mangled?)
 OLUTION-DEST-... strings.
 
   Does that provide any insight wrt. code to audit for this huge leak ?
 apparently it afflicts everything from SLED10-SP1 onwards. Also - in
 general to reduce the (high) e-d-s memory usage, should we be using
 GQuarks for some of these field names as we store them ?
 
   Thanks,
 
   Michael.
 
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers