Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-07-27 Thread Murray Cumming
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:51 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: I created a version of this patch for the master branch here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653560 I seem to have accidentally pushed the version for gnome-2-32 a few days ago:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-28 Thread Murray Cumming
I created a version of this patch for the master branch here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653560 -- murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:47 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: $(top_builddir)/addressbook/libedata-book/e-addressbook-factory -r The -r (or --keep-running) is something I added fairly recently for my own testing. It prevents the daemon from automatically shutting down when the last client

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-16 Thread Murray Cumming
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:47 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 16:04 +0100, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: Right - its D-Bus activated on the newly launched session bus. I am guessing what we'd need is a .service file to point to the e-addressbook-factory binary inside of

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-15 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 14:03 +0100, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: [snip] Matthew Barnes wrote: You could probably get away with just using a date stamp instead of random characters for XX. The key is really for each address book to have its own unique ESource ID. The attached patch

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-15 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales
Le mercredi 15 juin 2011 à 13:39 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit : On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 14:03 +0100, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: [snip] Matthew Barnes wrote: You could probably get away with just using a date stamp instead of random characters for XX. The key is really for each

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-15 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 16:04 +0100, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: Right - its D-Bus activated on the newly launched session bus. I am guessing what we'd need is a .service file to point to the e-addressbook-factory binary inside of e-d-s' source directory. We could point the newly launched

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-09 Thread Matthew Barnes
: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:32:24 -0400 On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 10:10 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: An environment variable can be set easily, for all tests, and maybe for individual tests, like so in addressbook/tests/ebook/Makefile.am

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-09 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales
@gnome.org, Tristan Van Berkom trista...@openismus.com Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:32:24 -0400 On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 10:10 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: An environment variable can be set easily, for all tests, and maybe

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-08 Thread Murray Cumming
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 08:55 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: [snip] In order to fix the tests properly under the current API, the test harness would need to override the XDG_DATA_HOME environment variable to point to some directory in /tmp/ebook-test-XX before running the tests. The file

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make check failing in the e-d-s gnome-2-32

2011-06-07 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 09:08 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: In the gnome-2-32 branch, several make check tests fail intermittently for me, as seen below. I'm running them in jhbuild. This seems to be fixed in the gnome-3-0 branch and in the master branch. Does anyone know what commit fixed it,