On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 22:50 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> >
> > > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They
> > are up
> > > now, but would be updated ever
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
>
> > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They
> are up
> > now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
> >
> > The nightly builds now have 2.29.6
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
>
> > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They are up
> > now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
> >
> > The nightly builds now have 2.29.6+
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They are up
> now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
>
> The nightly builds now have 2.29.6+ running.
Thanks. I gave it a quick try and it complains that "No
Hello,
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 12:05 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 17:05 +, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > > I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 17:05 +, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715
> >
> > What would be the least risky way to do this?
> >
> > S
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715
>
> What would be the least risky way to do this?
>
> Sorry, I realize this is a pretty basic question for a "hackers" list.
Th
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 19:14 -0800, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > > Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> > > SUSE (11.2)?
> >
> > http://download.o
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> > SUSE (11.2)?
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME://Evolution://snapshots/openSUSE_11.2/
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in the
> past, when I've tried to use packages from openSUSE Factory, it also had
> dependencies on newer versions of the entire gnome stack which was a big
> headache.
Just a quick n
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > Barring that, what would be the best way to test the current unstable
> > release of Evolution? Should I just compile it from source and run it
> > from my home directory? Again, I fear the list of "dev" package
> > dependencies.
>
> AF
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> SUSE (11.2)?
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME://Evolution://snapshots/openSUSE_11.2/
> I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in th
12 matches
Mail list logo
