Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-14 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:33 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 04:47 -0700, Vibha Yadav wrote: > > Evolution is now compilable against gtk3. Please checkout the gtk3 branch > > for > > + gtkhtml > > + evolution-data-server > > + evolution > > Awesome! Nice work! +1 :) - Chenth

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-14 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 04:47 -0700, Vibha Yadav wrote: > Evolution is now compilable against gtk3. Please checkout the gtk3 branch for > + gtkhtml > + evolution-data-server > + evolution Awesome! Nice work! Let's hope that's the last of the API breaks. ___

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-14 Thread Stefano Facchini
Il giorno mar, 14/12/2010 alle 04.47 -0700, Vibha Yadav ha scritto: > Evolution is now compilable against gtk3. Please checkout the gtk3 branch for > + gtkhtml > + evolution-data-server > + evolution > > Also checkout the tracker bug for gtk3 compatibility issues. > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-14 Thread Vibha Yadav
Evolution is now compilable against gtk3. Please checkout the gtk3 branch for + gtkhtml + evolution-data-server + evolution Also checkout the tracker bug for gtk3 compatibility issues. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636677 -- Thanks, Vibha On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 12:11 -0600, Matthew

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:09 +0100, Stefano Facchini wrote: > Il giorno mar, 07/12/2010 alle 15.02 -0600, Matthew Barnes ha scritto: > > > Are you aware of this? > > > > Yes, it turned out to be a GTK+ bug. It was fixed last month. > > > > So to fix it I'd need to update GTK+2, not evolution? C

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 21:50 +0100, Stefano Facchini wrote: > I didn't mean that I wanted to file bugs about compilation, but about > the window showing the list of emails. Instead of showing the list, it > shows whatever occupied that region of the screen before switching to > Evolution mail: for e

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Stefano Facchini
> Evolution does not yet build against the latest round of API breaks in > gtk3. The others may or may not. Ok, maybe I'll wait until everything is fixed :) > No need to file bugs (unless you're > submitting patches) -- we're well aware of it. > I didn't mean that I wanted to file bugs about co

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 18:37 +0100, Stefano Facchini wrote: > BTW how can I compile the gtk3 branch? I have already cloned evolution, > evolution-data-server and gtkhtml git repositories. What I have to do > now? $ git branch --track gtk3 origin/gtk3 $ git checkout gtk3 $ ./configure --enable-gtk3

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Stefano Facchini
BTW how can I compile the gtk3 branch? I have already cloned evolution, evolution-data-server and gtkhtml git repositories. What I have to do now? Il giorno mar, 07/12/2010 alle 12.54 +0100, Rodrigo Moya ha scritto: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:17 +0100, Stefano Facchini wrote: > > Hi, > > I have

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Stefano Facchini
Ok, then I'll file a bug about this issue in the email list window. Il giorno mar, 07/12/2010 alle 12.54 +0100, Rodrigo Moya ha scritto: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:17 +0100, Stefano Facchini wrote: > > Hi, > > I have the latest version of gnome-shell 2.91 running and I'd like to > > build evoluti

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:17 +0100, Stefano Facchini wrote: > Hi, > I have the latest version of gnome-shell 2.91 running and I'd like to > build evolution 2.91 against the gtk3 library. Is there any instruction > to do this? > there's the gtk3 branch, but it still doesn't compile fully __