On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:36 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I'm trying to operate a 'trickle down' policy, where I only commit fixes
> to gnome-2-32 if they are already in master *and* gnome-3-0. That way,
> things don't get lost — and we don't end up in the odd situation where a
> bug is fixed in
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 08:21 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> were any of them still present in master/3.0? If so, which bugs is
> this about, please?
There were two which affect master/3.0. They are both now fixed in
master and the gnome-3-0 branch.
I'm trying to operate a 'trickle down' policy, where
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 09:16 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Since the early QA has also shown up a bunch of evo/eds bugs
Hi,
were any of them still present in master/3.0? If so, which bugs is this
about, please?
Bye,
Milan
___
ev
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 09:16 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> We can use these builds for doing pre-Alpha testing of EWS.
... which has already failed :)
Exchange puts some items in your inbox on which the 'message:From'
property is invalid. And rather than giving a warning but returning the
rest o
