On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 08:50 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> what about wait till Wednesday, after evolution team meeting, and then
> merge gtk3 branches to master branches, and require gtk3 for the Monday
> 2.91.6 release? It saves a bit of work for you, and also forces people
> to fix new issues relate
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 14:01 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Would anyone mind if I do another round of gtk3 rebases?
Hi,
what about wait till Wednesday, after evolution team meeting, and then
merge gtk3 branches to master branches, and require gtk3 for the Monday
2.91.6 release? It saves a
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 20:53 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> The gtk3 branches are rebased now. Delete your local copy.
Would anyone mind if I do another round of gtk3 rebases?
Benjamin Otte fixed most of the gnome-canvas issues, and I've been
rebasing and reorganizing commits on my gtk3 branches
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 15:13 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> If no one objects I'll plan to do this later this week. So speak up now
> or commit now if you have any pending changes. I'll make sure any last
> minute commits aren't lost.
The gtk3 branches are rebased now. Delete your local copy.
