On 10/06/2012 09:01 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 22:19 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
a.) e_source_registry_commit_source_sync() seems not exactly
very sync. I haven't looked into that in detail but
surely the registry server needs to block on something
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 18:25 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
I'm not sure what the solution should be exactly, but we
should discuss this a bit because the problem space is
a little bigger than just the source existing in the
client-side before e_source_registry_commit_source_sync()
returns.
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 08:11 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 18:25 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
I'm not sure what the solution should be exactly, but we
should discuss this a bit because the problem space is
a little bigger than just the source existing in the
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 20:35 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Ah, this is gold.
I'll be able to readjust things with this.
I've added a new section to the migration guide which covers the basics
of creating a new local address book or calendar:
On 10/05/2012 09:00 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 20:35 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Ah, this is gold.
I'll be able to readjust things with this.
I've added a new section to the migration guide which covers the basics
of creating a new local address book or calendar:
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 22:19 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
a.) e_source_registry_commit_source_sync() seems not exactly
very sync. I haven't looked into that in detail but
surely the registry server needs to block on something else
before sending the reply.
The issue
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 13:30 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
I'm still trying to find my footing here, the migration guide
and new documentation on ESourceRegistry don't seem to outline
how a new addressbook is actually created.
i.e. if I wanted to test a specific addressbook backend,
I
On 10/02/2012 01:30 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On 10/01/2012 09:08 PM, Dan Vrátil wrote:
On Monday 01 of October 2012 20:41:07 Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Hi,
It's recently come to my attention that a vast API break[0] has
been introduced in the last (3.6) cycle of EDS.
Unfortunately
On 10/02/2012 08:29 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 13:30 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
I'm still trying to find my footing here, the migration guide
and new documentation on ESourceRegistry don't seem to outline
how a new addressbook is actually created.
i.e. if I wanted to
On 10/01/2012 09:08 PM, Dan Vrátil wrote:
On Monday 01 of October 2012 20:41:07 Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Hi,
It's recently come to my attention that a vast API break[0] has
been introduced in the last (3.6) cycle of EDS.
Unfortunately this also breaks the vast majority of the test cases
10 matches
Mail list logo
