Re: [Evolution-hackers] SyncEvolution + EClient API + EXDATE regression (Bug #655253)

2011-09-14 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 18:44 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Di, 2011-09-13 at 17:59 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: The root cause of the bug is that the detached recurrences, if created with current Evolution master, do not get the same UID as the original recurring event. I've verified that by

Re: [Evolution-hackers] SyncEvolution + EClient API + EXDATE regression (Bug #655253)

2011-09-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mi, 2011-09-14 at 08:28 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: yes, I agree, it wasn't the right change, I'm sorry for that. Please revert the commit and reopen the bug. I reverted the EXDATE part of the commit, but couldn't reopen the bug (Bugzilla does't offer me that option). Can you reopen it? --

Re: [Evolution-hackers] SyncEvolution + EClient API + EXDATE regression (Bug #655253)

2011-09-14 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 09:50 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Mi, 2011-09-14 at 08:28 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: yes, I agree, it wasn't the right change, I'm sorry for that. Please revert the commit and reopen the bug. I reverted the EXDATE part of the commit, but couldn't reopen the bug

Re: [Evolution-hackers] SyncEvolution + EClient API + EXDATE regression (Bug #655253)

2011-09-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2011-09-12 at 09:09 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Mo, 2011-09-12 at 07:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:32 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Milan, can you shed some light on why the patch solves #655253? I fail to see what e_cal_backend_file_modify_object() has to do

Re: [Evolution-hackers] SyncEvolution + EClient API + EXDATE regression (Bug #655253)

2011-09-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Di, 2011-09-13 at 17:59 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Mo, 2011-09-12 at 09:09 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Mo, 2011-09-12 at 07:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:32 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Milan, can you shed some light on why the patch solves #655253? I fail