Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-04 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Matthew, On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 10:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: And while we're at it, can we please drop the meaningless -1.2 suffix from the library names (e.g. libedataserver-1.2.so)? As far as I can tell this is just an artifact from an age before the EDS sonames were

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-04 Thread Ross Burton
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 10:05 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Even I would have loved this if we can get all the friends to be 2.22. Unfortunately GtkHTML can't be 2.22 as it is already 3.xx. I felt that synchronizing the minor versions is fine. I'm not really against it, if there aren't any

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-04 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 09:57 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: Cue, screaming ... please read: http://lxr.go-oo.org/source/dba/connectivity/source/drivers/evoab2/EApi.cxx#046 and reconsider ;-) be aware that it takes weeks to months to get that change up-stream, and months to get a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Ross Burton
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be fine, if we just sync the minor versions. Evolution 2.22 GtkHTML 3.22 Evolution Data Server

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Mittwoch, den 03.10.2007, 13:43 +0200 schrieb Jules Colding: Does it really matter? But, well, I doesn't care so please go ahead... it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version corresponds to which gnome release for gtk+, glib, evofriends and other modules (i'm happy that atk,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Jules Colding
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 14:17 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 03.10.2007, 13:43 +0200 schrieb Jules Colding: Does it really matter? But, well, I doesn't care so please go ahead... it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version corresponds to which gnome release for

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be fine, if we just sync the minor versions. Evolution 2.22 GtkHTML 3.22 Evolution Data Server

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 14:17 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version corresponds to which gnome release for gtk+, glib, evofriends and other modules (i'm happy that atk, at-spi gail already switched to the gnome versioning a few months back),

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 09:03 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be fine, if we just sync the minor

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 12:53 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be fine, if we just sync the minor versions.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:51 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: Applications that link to E-D-S would have to be recompiled obviously, but as long as they're using pkgconfig correctly they should not require any code changes (I think). I knew this claim would come back to bite me. The pkgconfig

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Matthew, On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:51 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 12:53 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20).

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Ross, Even I would have loved this if we can get all the friends to be 2.22. Unfortunately GtkHTML can't be 2.22 as it is already 3.xx. I felt that synchronizing the minor versions is fine. I'm not really against it, if there aren't any major objections to this. -Srini. On Wed, 2007-10-03 at