Re: [Evolution-hackers] checking Evolution with valgrind

2008-03-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:03 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 19:33 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: The best is that if you could track it down to Evolution, file a bug with the valgrind traces and CC me there. ... this is exactly what I won't have time for - sorry! I was

Re: [Evolution-hackers] checking Evolution with valgrind

2008-03-29 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 14:46 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: My offer still stands: I could add interested developers to CC of the emails which report nightly test success or failure. I look at the results rather sporadically; this time only two days have passed since the tests started to fail, but

Re: [Evolution-hackers] checking Evolution with valgrind

2008-03-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 12:32 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 14:46 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: My offer still stands: I could add interested developers to CC of the emails which report nightly test success or failure. I look at the results rather sporadically; this time

Re: [Evolution-hackers] checking Evolution with valgrind

2008-03-26 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 20:58 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello, as part of the nightly testing that I mentioned recently I now also started to run evolution-data-server and the test program under valgrind, including --leak-check=yes. That covers the file backends for calendar and contacts,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] checking Evolution with valgrind

2008-03-26 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 23:44 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 20:58 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: as part of the nightly testing that I mentioned recently I now also started to run evolution-data-server and the test program under valgrind, including --leak-check=yes. That