Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-09-14 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 15:20 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
 Dear Nirav,

Ping. :)

 
 my two questions still stand.
 Can you please answer them?
 
 Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 12:54 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: 
  So have you tried creating a new account on go-evolution.org? 
  If so, please share the steps. Because I fail. Removing the very basic
  features of a wiki (participation) is not what I'd call a solution.
 
 Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
  Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 00:54 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar:
  Migrating Wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution may be difficult with the
  high data content that evolution wiki holds.
 
  Please provide exact numbers.
 
 Thanks,
 andre



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-09-04 Thread Andre Klapper
Dear Nirav,

my two questions still stand.
Can you please answer them?

Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 12:54 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: 
 So have you tried creating a new account on go-evolution.org? 
 If so, please share the steps. Because I fail. Removing the very basic
 features of a wiki (participation) is not what I'd call a solution.

Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
 Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 00:54 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar:
 Migrating Wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution may be difficult with the
 high data content that evolution wiki holds.

 Please provide exact numbers.

Thanks,
andre
-- 
 mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
 http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-08-18 Thread Nirav Kumar
Hi Andre,
There were some changes done in the LocalSetting files to restrict
account creation.Seems it is not fully working.
Will be working with IST department for closure on this.

Regards
Nirav
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:34 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
 Hi Nirav,
 
 any news here?
 
 http://www.go-evolution.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangesdays=7
 
 andre
 
 Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 19:20 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar:
  On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
   On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote:
As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis?
   
   Define revamping.
  To revise(make changes) or reconstruct 
   
   
Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for
installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org.
   
   Do you mean Drupal?  That would answer my earlier question.
  Yes
   live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal?
  Mostly Drupal gets used.I am catching up with IST on details.Will
  confirm.
   
   Matthew Barnes
   

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-08-18 Thread Nirav Kumar
Hi Andre,
The changes were done on 13th Aug and hence thereafter i am not seeing
any new account creation.Seems things are working OK.

Regards
Nirav
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 02:56 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote:
 Hi Andre,
 There were some changes done in the LocalSetting files to restrict
 account creation.Seems it is not fully working.
 Will be working with IST department for closure on this.
 
 Regards
 Nirav
 On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:34 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
  Hi Nirav,
  
  any news here?
  
  http://www.go-evolution.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangesdays=7
  
  andre
  
  Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 19:20 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar:
   On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote:
 As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis?

Define revamping.
   To revise(make changes) or reconstruct 


 Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for
 installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org.

Do you mean Drupal?  That would answer my earlier question.
   Yes
live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal?
   Mostly Drupal gets used.I am catching up with IST on details.Will
   confirm.

Matthew Barnes

 
 ___
 Evolution-hackers mailing list
 Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-08-17 Thread Andre Klapper
Hi Nirav,

any news here?

http://www.go-evolution.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangesdays=7

andre

Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 19:20 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar:
 On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
  On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote:
   As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis?
  
  Define revamping.
 To revise(make changes) or reconstruct 
  
  
   Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for
   installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org.
  
  Do you mean Drupal?  That would answer my earlier question.
 Yes
  live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal?
 Mostly Drupal gets used.I am catching up with IST on details.Will
 confirm.
  
  Matthew Barnes
  
-- 
 mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-08-03 Thread Nirav Kumar
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 11:56 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 07:25 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
  On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:32 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
 The archived contents would be eventually moved to
   www.gnome.org/projects/evolution . Time-line for the same is not yet
   decided. Until then the contents would remain in go-evolution.org.
  
  Okay, so what does moving wiki contents to a non-wiki website mean
  exactly?  Do we snapshot all the pages and copy the static HTML?  And if
  we do that, how do we find archived wiki pages without the wiki's search
  feature?  I guess we'd have to set up a global index page or something?
 Yes copying the static html. Manual work might be required. We should be
 having indexes like we have already at,
 http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/developer.shtml .
 
  
  Another option, perhaps only for the short-term, might be to just lock
  down go-evolution.org so no new accounts, pages, or edits are possible.
  That should preserve the search feature, and also solve the spam
  problem, no?
 Possible. We still need get the admin right for that. Nirav ?
Let me know the plan for migration and i will try to get things set up
accordingly.
 
  
  On a different note, now that we've decided to move we need to compile a
  list of which pages to move.  How about we set up a wiki page for that
  and invite both developers and the community (or at least the evo-list
  subscribers) to add what wiki pages they'd like to see moved.  Set a
  deadline of, say, end of August?
 Lets first gather the contents to be migrated to lgo and
 gnome.org/projects/evolution. This will give us an idea to choose a
 right dead-line along with individuals for the tasks.
 
  
  On a third note, anyone know of a good MediaWiki-to-MoinMoin syntax
  conversion program?  My Google results have yielded mostly conversion
  scripts in the opposite direction (MoinMoin-to-MediaWiki), or else
  software that requires admin access to the MoinMoin database.
 I searched for it sometime back. I did find scripts to convert form
 moinmoin-to-mediawiki but not vice-versa :( May be a question on pgo
 might help to find if anyone else knows ?
 
 - Chenthill.
  
  Matthew Barnes
 
 ___
 Evolution-hackers mailing list
 Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-30 Thread P Chenthill
We had a discussion in yesterday's #evolution-meet about the
go-evolution.org wiki to conclude on things. We have now made a decision
to move the wiki to l.g.o.
The archived contents would be eventually moved to
www.gnome.org/projects/evolution . Time-line for the same is not yet
decided. Until then the contents would remain in go-evolution.org.

Meeting logs -
http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/2009-07-29.shtml .

Thanks, Chenthill.
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 17:51 +, Matthew Barnes wrote:
 On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 22:57 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote:
  http://www.go-evolution.org/Special:Version
  
  Mediawiki :-)
 
 Ah, thanks for that!  Now I can actually conduct some experiments.
 
 Matthew Barnes
 ___
 Evolution-hackers mailing list
 Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers







___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-30 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:32 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
   The archived contents would be eventually moved to
 www.gnome.org/projects/evolution . Time-line for the same is not yet
 decided. Until then the contents would remain in go-evolution.org.

Okay, so what does moving wiki contents to a non-wiki website mean
exactly?  Do we snapshot all the pages and copy the static HTML?  And if
we do that, how do we find archived wiki pages without the wiki's search
feature?  I guess we'd have to set up a global index page or something?

Another option, perhaps only for the short-term, might be to just lock
down go-evolution.org so no new accounts, pages, or edits are possible.
That should preserve the search feature, and also solve the spam
problem, no?

On a different note, now that we've decided to move we need to compile a
list of which pages to move.  How about we set up a wiki page for that
and invite both developers and the community (or at least the evo-list
subscribers) to add what wiki pages they'd like to see moved.  Set a
deadline of, say, end of August?

On a third note, anyone know of a good MediaWiki-to-MoinMoin syntax
conversion program?  My Google results have yielded mostly conversion
scripts in the opposite direction (MoinMoin-to-MediaWiki), or else
software that requires admin access to the MoinMoin database.

Matthew Barnes


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-27 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 19:20 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
  On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote:
   As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis?
  
  Define revamping.
 To revise(make changes) or reconstruct 
  
  
   Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for
   installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org.
  
  Do you mean Drupal?  That would answer my earlier question.
 Yes
  live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal?
 Mostly Drupal gets used.

http://www.go-evolution.org/Special:Version

Mediawiki :-)


-- 
Johnny (johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org)
May you share freely, never taking more than you give 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-27 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
  We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though
  they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold
  true ;)
 
 A compromise might be to only migrate the pages with current and
 accurate information to l.g.o, and keep go-evolution.org around as a
 historical archive.  Archived pages brought back to life at a later date
 could be migrated individually.  It -is- a wiki, after all.
 
 Might be interesting to compile a list of pages we still maintain or
 care about.  I have a few not listed on the front page (BugzillaTopics
 and ReleaseHOWTO, for example).
 
 Perhaps a bigger issue is converting the page markup.  I've noticed
 syntactic differences between the two sites [1], but I don't even know
 what wiki software the two sites are using.  Need to see if there's
 markup migration scripts out there.
 
 Matthew Barnes
 
 
 [1] live.gnome.org's markup syntax seems way more expressive and is
 actually DOCUMENTED! (http://live.gnome.org/HelpOnEditing)  Unlike
 our own. (http://www.go-evolution.org/Help:Editing)  Not to mention
 the style sheets are prettier.


**IMHO** I would prefer live.gnome.org . So +1 for that.

And somebody suggested that we can redirect go-evolution.org domain to
live.gnome.org/evolution 


-- 
Johnny (johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org)
May you share freely, never taking more than you give 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Whatever you do, please do something quickly, todays spamming is at a
rate that I can barely sustain.

-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue gilles.dartiguelon...@esiee.org


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread Chenthill
Am including nirav in the thread. He is working on with the novell IST
to get the required rights. He would be able to provide more details..
  
Thanks, Chenthill.
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
 Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 21:31 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes:
  I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about
  eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution.
 
 I am all for it.
 
  I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki
 
 According to Parag Srini has sysop rights.
 
 andre



___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread Nirav Kumar
Hi Andre,
Migrating Wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution may be difficult with the
high data content that evolution wiki holds.
I would believe that installing captcha and updating drupple should be
able to provide the desired results.I am working with Novell IST and
hope to have something positive in next few days.

Regards
Nirav
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:06 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
 Am including nirav in the thread. He is working on with the novell IST
 to get the required rights. He would be able to provide more details..
   
 Thanks, Chenthill.
 On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
  Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 21:31 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes:
   I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about
   eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution.
  
  I am all for it.
  
   I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki
  
  According to Parag Srini has sysop rights.
  
  andre
 
 
 

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread Sankar P
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Nirav Kumarkni...@novell.com wrote:
 Hi Andre,
 Migrating Wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution may be difficult with the
 high data content that evolution wiki holds.

I don't see a high data content. There are Camel docs, plugin docs,
some design docs about shell and threading, most of which will have to
change anyway, soon. And most of the other links originating from the
go-evolution home page points to obsolete contents. There are some
test cases, but iirc they are stored in Novell testopia already.

 I would believe that installing captcha and updating drupple should be
 able to provide the desired results.I am working with Novell IST and
 hope to have something positive in next few days.


These two are the problems at the moment. But by moving to
live.gnome.org, there are other benefits like:

- we align more with the rest of the Gnome projects
- one place to search docs for all projects and easy to link to docs
of other project pages, say libsoup.
- no need to create yet-another-new-account to edit evo project pages.
anyone with a gnome account can edit pages.

and above all,

- Gnome sysadmins are easily reachable for non-Novell folks to report
and rectify any problems, than Novell IST. There will be a single
point of contact for admin related issues.

If all these does not convince you, you can save dollars on the
storage space for the site ;-) . So imho, it is definitely worth
moving to live.gnome.org .

 Regards
 Nirav
 On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:06 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
 Am including nirav in the thread. He is working on with the novell IST
 to get the required rights. He would be able to provide more details..

 Thanks, Chenthill.
 On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
  Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 21:31 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes:
   I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about
   eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution.
 
  I am all for it.
 
   I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki
 
  According to Parag Srini has sysop rights.
 
  andre




 ___
 Evolution-hackers mailing list
 Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers




-- 
Sankar P
http://psankar.blogspot.com
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:35 +0530, Sankar P wrote:
 I don't see a high data content. There are Camel docs, plugin docs,
 some design docs about shell and threading, most of which will have to
 change anyway, soon. And most of the other links originating from the
 go-evolution home page points to obsolete contents. There are some
 test cases, but iirc they are stored in Novell testopia already.

...snip...

 If all these does not convince you, you can save dollars on the
 storage space for the site ;-) . So imho, it is definitely worth
 moving to live.gnome.org .

+1  Well stated.  :)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread P Chenthill
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 07:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:35 +0530, Sankar P wrote:
  I don't see a high data content. There are Camel docs, plugin docs,
  some design docs about shell and threading, most of which will have to
  change anyway, soon. And most of the other links originating from the
  go-evolution home page points to obsolete contents. There are some
  test cases, but iirc they are stored in Novell testopia already.
We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though
they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold
true ;)

 ...snip...
 
  If all these does not convince you, you can save dollars on the
  storage space for the site ;-) . So imho, it is definitely worth
  moving to live.gnome.org .
 
 +1  Well stated.  :)
I concur with this provided all the old data are still maintained.

- Chenthill.

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread Chenthill
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
  We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though
  they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold
  true ;)
 
 A compromise might be to only migrate the pages with current and
 accurate information to l.g.o, and keep go-evolution.org around as a
 historical archive.  Archived pages brought back to life at a later date
 could be migrated individually.  It -is- a wiki, after all.
Makes sense. How about putting the architecture and other historic data
on roadmaps into www.gnome.org/projects/evolution and current pages in
l.g.o ?

Close go-evolution.org once for all.

- Chenthill.
 
 Might be interesting to compile a list of pages we still maintain or
 care about.  I have a few not listed on the front page (BugzillaTopics
 and ReleaseHOWTO, for example).
 
 Perhaps a bigger issue is converting the page markup.  I've noticed
 syntactic differences between the two sites [1], but I don't even know
 what wiki software the two sites are using.  Need to see if there's
 markup migration scripts out there.
 
 Matthew Barnes
 
 
 [1] live.gnome.org's markup syntax seems way more expressive and is
 actually DOCUMENTED! (http://live.gnome.org/HelpOnEditing)  Unlike
 our own. (http://www.go-evolution.org/Help:Editing)  Not to mention
 the style sheets are prettier.


___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread Nirav Kumar
Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for
installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org.This may
take approx 2 weeks.If things are not possible, i can confirm earlier
and a migration/closure decision can be taken accordingly.

Nirav
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
  We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though
  they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold
  true ;)
 
 A compromise might be to only migrate the pages with current and
 accurate information to l.g.o, and keep go-evolution.org around as a
 historical archive.  Archived pages brought back to life at a later date
 could be migrated individually.  It -is- a wiki, after all.
 
 Might be interesting to compile a list of pages we still maintain or
 care about.  I have a few not listed on the front page (BugzillaTopics
 and ReleaseHOWTO, for example).
 
 Perhaps a bigger issue is converting the page markup.  I've noticed
 syntactic differences between the two sites [1], but I don't even know
 what wiki software the two sites are using.  Need to see if there's
 markup migration scripts out there.
 
 Matthew Barnes
 
 
 [1] live.gnome.org's markup syntax seems way more expressive and is
 actually DOCUMENTED! (http://live.gnome.org/HelpOnEditing)  Unlike
 our own. (http://www.go-evolution.org/Help:Editing)  Not to mention
 the style sheets are prettier.

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread Nirav Kumar
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote:
  As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis?
 
 Define revamping.
To revise(make changes) or reconstruct 
 
 
  Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for
  installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org.
 
 Do you mean Drupal?  That would answer my earlier question.
Yes
 live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal?
Mostly Drupal gets used.I am catching up with IST on details.Will
confirm.
 
 Matthew Barnes
 

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-15 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 21:31 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes:
 I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about
 eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution.

I am all for it.

 I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki

According to Parag Srini has sysop rights.

andre
-- 
 mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-12 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 00:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
 Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 00:44 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit :
  Hej hej Parag!
  
  Some Novell folks told me that you maintain go-evolution.org which is
  constantly spammed by bots, see Gilles' email here:
  http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2009-February/msg5.html
   
  
  For a quick solution, can you please remove the account GetelNovia?
  
  Any proposals for a long term solution, like updating the wiki software
  (captchas etc)?
  
 Any updates on this stuff, I'm now confronted with spambots which create
 random accounts and write spam to their user page.
 
 See:
 http://www.go-evolution.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangesdays=30limit=500
 

I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about
eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution.  All the
pages could be rooted from there, e.g.:

  go-evolution.org/FAQ - live.gnome.org/evolution/FAQ

I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki nor whether those
person(s) even maintain it anymore.  I also have not been able to get a
straight answer out of anyone after asking repeatedly for admin rights.

I presume live.gnome.org is actively maintained with stronger anti-spam
measures, and I think it's a more suitable place for Evolution content.
Plus, it would be easier to link to other GNOME-related information on
that wiki.

Matthew Barnes


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki spam

2007-05-16 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 19:27 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
 On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 15:40 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
  Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 18:51 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
   Hi Gilles,
   
   I dont see the spam in the Main_Page. Am I seeing elsewhere?
  
  click on see source as text.
  It's in a tag with css style making it invisible to users (namely  div
  id=wyikol style=overflow:auto; height: 1px; )
 Ah! Caught it. Removed.
 
 -Srini.
  
  
 


following meeting, I did a quick search and came up with this :

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ConfirmEdit

hope it helps.
-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki spam

2007-05-15 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 18:51 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
 Hi Gilles,
 
 I dont see the spam in the Main_Page. Am I seeing elsewhere?

click on see source as text.
It's in a tag with css style making it invisible to users (namely  div
id=wyikol style=overflow:auto; height: 1px; )


-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki spam

2007-05-15 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 15:40 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
 Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 18:51 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
  Hi Gilles,
  
  I dont see the spam in the Main_Page. Am I seeing elsewhere?
 
 click on see source as text.
 It's in a tag with css style making it invisible to users (namely  div
 id=wyikol style=overflow:auto; height: 1px; )
Ah! Caught it. Removed.

-Srini.
 
 

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers