Re: [Evolution-hackers] mmap() for the summary file

2006-06-19 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 11:56 +0200, Florian Boor wrote: > as long as we talk about individual senders this is true, but if you think > about > mailinglists and all this automated server notifications this could save > quite > some memory. As long as it is possible to implement this without a too

Re: [Evolution-hackers] mmap() for the summary file

2006-06-19 Thread Florian Boor
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > H... I am not really convinced yet; I mean even when I have > 100 mails with the same email address in my Inbox (which seems > a lot from one person!). The email-address would be 20 chars; now having > 'm all in one string saves me, even in this extreme case, on

RE: [Evolution-hackers] mmap() for the summary file

2006-06-12 Thread Dirk-Jan.Binnema
Hi Philip and others, >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ext >Philip Van Hoof >Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 16:56 >To: evolution-hackers >Subject: [Evolution-hackers] mmap() for the summary file >I've been trying to replace the fread()/f