Hi,
Pre...
Ubuntu 8.04, Latest updates installed
Evolution: 2.22.3.1
Recently, I get errors sending e-mails:
Error while performing operation. DATA command failed: Message refused
I've changed my default mail server to GoDaddy. and it seems only to
happen when using those accounts.
I'm
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 01:24 -0600, Kojak T wrote:
Hi,
Pre...
Ubuntu 8.04, Latest updates installed
Evolution: 2.22.3.1
Recently, I get errors sending e-mails:
Error while performing operation. DATA command failed: Message refused
I've changed my default mail server to
Hi all.
Thanks to help from Patrick and a few others, I have a new version of my
makefile to build Evolution from source, that works with the new GIT
repositories. It currently builds the latest content of the gnome-2.28
GIT branch (I didn't try the MASTER branch since I think it's unstable
due
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 09:04 +0200, Milan Crha wrote
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 20:58 +0100, Paul Leyland wrote:
How can I configure Evolution so that it *always* encrypts to the GPG
key of the recipients of the mail I send?
It's easy to see how to set it always to sign with GPG and/or SMIME and
Thanks Adam for your insightful answer - I begin to understand the
problem. But the more I look into it the worse it gets. I think this is
just the tip of the iceberg.
One aspect of the problem arises - as you pointed out - from my wish to
press org data in a framework (vcard) designed for
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 06:55 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
...
I use GPG a lot, but it is actually more complicated than just always
encrypt. What if no key is available, should it complain or just
silently not encrypt?
It complains to me when the recipient key is not found and asks me to
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 17:33 +0200, Lars Schade wrote:
...
Is there any reason not to use a schema exactly matching the evo GUI
or, alternatively, sticking to a general vcard schema and adjusting
the evo GUI accordingly?
...
Hi,
as far as I can tell, there is a schema file to support
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:10:25 -0400
Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.net wrote:
So, this is more of a debugging aid at this point than a true stable
replacement. I'm looking for folks who are intrepid and maybe know a
bit about building software and makefiles, who'd like to give it a try
and
All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
mailing lists, couldn't we add configurations where you set:
For regular reply or reply-to-all: {Use top posting / Use bottom
posting}
For reply-to-mailing
Am Montag, den 19.10.2009, 18:37 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 19:50 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
You are correct. NM is running and does not show the e100 eth0
interface. Thanks for pointing me into the correct direction!
Glad it worked. Just note that you
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:32:59 -0400, Ben May escribió:
All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
mailing lists, couldn't we add configurations where you set:
For regular reply or
if it has todo with definite truth.»
José Saramago, Historia del Cerca de Lisboa
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
__ NOD32 4527 (20091020) Information
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:57:10 -0400, Derek McDaniel escribió:
Its much easier to top post to non-mailing list clients. You need to
realize, most people are not computer savy and don't care about the
netiquette as much as Linux users do. I wont bottom post to a client or
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:32 -0400, Ben May wrote:
All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
mailing lists, couldn't we add configurations where you set:
For regular reply or reply-to-all: {Use top
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:57 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
They get confused and it makes more work
for me to try and explain it. 90% of all users I email use top post
except
for mailing lists.
You can minimize that confusion with proper trimming. With Evo (to get
this back on topic), trimming
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:10 -0400, Matthias Apitz wrote:
All this would not happen if you use a realy good MUA (like 'mutt')
and a good text editor (like 'vim'), as I do.
Matthias, I am clueless as to why you monitor and participate in this
list devoted to Evo if you use mutt and vim, and
://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
__ NOD32 4527 (20091020) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:32 -0400, Ben May wrote:
All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
mailing lists, couldn't we add configurations where you set:
For regular reply or reply-to-all: {Use top
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:33 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
Plus, I prefer not to trim because if I am on my BB, and I didn't read
the first post, I can read the middle and understand the gist of
everything.
Am I the only one getting that's getting a *really* bad feeling about
the long-term
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:33 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
Plus, I prefer not to trim because if I am on my BB, and I didn't read
the first post, I can read the middle and understand the gist of
everything.
Am I the only one getting that's getting a *really* bad feeling about
the long-term
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 03:28:53 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:10 -0400, Matthias Apitz wrote:
All this would not happen if you use a realy good MUA (like 'mutt')
and a good text editor (like 'vim'), as I do.
Matthias, I am clueless as to why you
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:02 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
... They responded that that wasn't
really the idea, since the poster is meant to edit the quote (removing
irrelevant material and inserting comments) and that's easier to do from
the top down. Nevertheless they did agree to include
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:10 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:57:10 -0400, Derek McDaniel escribió:
Its much easier to top post to non-mailing list clients. You need to
realize, most people are not computer savy and don't care about the
netiquette as
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:43 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
This, using Evo, is required because in business I have to use an
Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP disabled. Ofc, Evo behaves better
than OutLook and I know that I can mark text before hitting reply
(but only one part of the old text).
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:41 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:33 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
Plus, I prefer not to trim because if I am on my BB, and I didn't read
the first post, I can read the middle and understand the gist of
everything.
Am I the only one
The whole point of my suggestion is that I like choice, as do a lot of
others. We'll NEVER get the bottom-posters to agree that anything other
than bottom-posting is acceptable, and you'll NEVER get people who
aren't aware of the argument or who are agnostic to its outcome to
follow all the
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:57:10PM -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:32:59 -0400, Ben May escribió:
All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
mailing
Matthias Apitz wrote:
Only one example: with .,$dCR i.e. with 5 key strokes I can remove
all from the actual line until the end of the text. An with one
key 'u' I get it back.
I love vim! Just wanted to make sure I clarified that first. And, I
didn't know about .,$dCR - very cool. I've
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:46, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:10 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:57:10 -0400, Derek McDaniel
escribió:
Its much easier to top post to non-mailing list clients.
bg:
That is an astonishing piece
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I took the view that Evo encourages top-posting because it places
the cursor at the top of the reply.
bg:
Only for the irremediably clueless and rude, or those who haven't
had the reason pointed out to them.
PO:
They responded that
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 16:07 -0400, bgzgn...@sf.porterfield.net wrote:
delete to end is hold Shift and Ctrl then press and
release End then press Del. Four keys vs 5.
I can do it it with 3 -- 2, if you count combos as 1.
Shift+End,Del
Undo it, Ctrl+z.
Moreover, it works like every other text
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:43 -0400, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 03:28:53 -0400, Art Alexion
escribió:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:10 -0400, Matthias Apitz wrote:
All this would not happen if you use a realy good MUA (like
'mutt')
and a good text editor
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 04:20:51 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
I can do it it with 3 -- 2, if you count combos as 1.
Shift+End,Del
Undo it, Ctrl+z.
Moreover, it works like every other text editor I use so I don't need
the additional step of looking up an arcane key combo.
Reid Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 16:07 -0400, bgzgn...@sf.porterfield.net wrote:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
try dG
Wow, that's even better! Totally OT now, but I love vim more and more. :)
--
Sean
___
Evolution-list mailing list
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 04:23:28 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
This, using Evo, is required because in business I have to use an
Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP disabled.
Matthais,
Weren't you the one chastising me for using a work-mandated Blackberry?
Don't know,
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:35 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:33 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
Plus, I prefer not to trim because if I am on my BB, and I didn't
read
the first post, I can read the middle and understand the gist of
everything.
Am I the only one
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 22:34 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 04:23:28 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
This, using Evo, is required because in business I have to use an
Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP disabled.
Matthais,
Weren't you the one
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 04:35:56 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
I thought the OpenMoko/Neo phones were merely
theoretical, because, until someone on this list mentioned one, I have
never heard of an actual sighting.
I use an Openmoko FR as my daily and only mobile phone.
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:47 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Personally my favorite Evo-only feature (at least I've not seen other
mail clients who use it) is how if you select a part of the message
then
reply, then only that part is quoted in your reply. If you get used
to
this feature, then the
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 13:08 -0700, bg wrote:
Nevertheless they did agree to include a Preference option
to place the cursor at the bottom.
bg:
Huge error in judgment, if you ask me, from a human factors
engineering viewpoint - guaranteed to encourage the lazy and
clueless to abandon
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:47 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Personally my favorite Evo-only feature (at least I've not seen other
mail clients who use it) is how if you select a part of the message
then reply, then only that part is quoted in your reply.
I also love this, but it's not unique to Evo.
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 16:50 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
Ironically, thinking back 15-18 years ago, it was the aol users we
hated because their mailer didn't quote anything and it was hard to
gauge context. You would get an email that just said, yes from
someone you hadn't recently asked a
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:51 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:43 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
This, using Evo, is required because in business I have to use an
Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP disabled. Ofc, Evo behaves better
than OutLook and I know that I can mark
43 matches
Mail list logo
