On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 06:22 -0500, Robert wrote:
> How does one import a block of past emails (.eml, or .msg): by
> highlighting my list, then dropping or pasting them
> into a blank area of Evolution's Inbox or similar folder?? If not,
> then I have to go back to TB kicking and screaming
> which
I just installed Evolution and, so far, liked its GUI far better than
Thunderbird. I am able to download
"current" emails from my servers.
The greatest difficulty I am having, though, with client mail servers
(which I thought Evo might have resolved) is
in importing past or "saved"
Am Dienstag, den 26.01.2016, 12:31 + schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 06:22 -0500, Robert wrote:
> > How does one import a block of past emails (.eml, or .msg): by
> > highlighting my list, then dropping or pasting them
> > into a blank area of Evolution's Inbox or similar
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 06:22 -0500, Robert wrote:
> The greatest difficulty I am having, though, with client mail servers
> (which I thought Evo might have resolved) is
> in importing past or "saved" messages--especially when I purchase a
> new computer or install to a different OS (say,
> from
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 15:35 +0100, Tom wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.01.2016, 12:31 + schrieb Patrick
> O'Callaghan:
> > On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 06:22 -0500, Robert wrote:
> > > How does one import a block of past emails (.eml, or .msg): by
> > > highlighting my list, then dropping or pasting
Andre, the instructions are incomplete in that they do not include information
on importing Outlook Express (OE) dbx folders. While OE is an obsolete product,
I still maintain my OE and the dbx folders on the Win XP side of my laptop.
When I moved over to evolution several years ago, I did not
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:36 -0500, John Lauterbach wrote:
> Andre, the instructions are incomplete in that they do not include
> information on importing Outlook Express (OE) dbx folders. While OE
> is an obsolete product, I still maintain my OE and the dbx folders on
> the Win XP side of my
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 10:42 -0800, str3tch3r str3tch3r wrote:
> It just seems like the threading option is incorrectly applying the
> parent-child relationship to different folders and the only thing
> different about these folders that I'm aware of is the plain-text vs
> html format.
Hi,
