Re: [Evolution] Erratic cursor location in composer

2016-02-11 Thread Tomas Popela
Hi, On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 16:39 -0800, Graham wrote: > In evolution 3.18.4 the cursor randomly jumps to the end of the > message while composing emails in html. I read this may be a webkit > issue. Is there a work around (other than plain text) or fix planned. > Thanks. Workaround is to not use

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Stig Roar Wangberg
to. den 11. 02. 2016 klokka 09.18 (+) skreiv Pete Biggs: > > Yes of course. I understand that. I'm just curious what those dat-files > > are. The sender didn't intentionally attach those files. Are they > > generated by Evolution? He sent one encrypted letter (file.gpg) as an > > attachment,

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Pete Biggs
> There are a lot of info there, and I'm not quite sure what I'm looking > for. Both the attachments says 'ordinary text document' (translated from > Norwegian), and the third says PGP/Mime encrypted.  > So they are something that was attached before it was received and nothing to do with

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Stig Roar Wangberg
to. den 11. 02. 2016 klokka 09.18 (+) skreiv Pete Biggs: > > Yes of course. I understand that. I'm just curious what those dat-files > > are. The sender didn't intentionally attach those files. Are they > > generated by Evolution? He sent one encrypted letter (file.gpg) as an > > attachment,

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 20:28 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote: > I'm just curious what the DAT-files are, that are created when I send > and receive attachments? I'd be very surprised if Evolution suddenly created .dat files.  I've only seen "winmail.dat" files created by Microsoft Exchange

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Pete Biggs
> Thank you! I tried to open them, by the way, in gedit, but they were > empty. I'm just worried because I downloaded them. I really hope they're > not doing my computer any harm. The sender doesn't understand it either. > I'll look into it. > The bottom line is that malware on Linux is quite

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Stig Roar Wangberg
to. den 11. 02. 2016 klokka 09.49 (+) skreiv Pete Biggs: > > There are a lot of info there, and I'm not quite sure what I'm looking > > for. Both the attachments says 'ordinary text document' (translated from > > Norwegian), and the third says PGP/Mime encrypted. > > > > So they are

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Stig Roar Wangberg
to. den 11. 02. 2016 klokka 10.09 (+) skreiv Pete Biggs: > > > > OK, so I ran the file command, file attachment.dat, and got this > > message: 'very short file (no magic)'. No 'strange' number or strings or > > anything! Extremely educational answers from you, even though it's 'far > > from

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:17:01 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote: >The files aren't dangerous in any way? I don't think so, but consider to use an online virus scanner. IMO it's dangerous, if a group of people feels secure using gpg, but having misconceptions about how it works. Once you figured out

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Stig Roar Wangberg
to. den 11. 02. 2016 klokka 09.45 (+0100) skreiv Andre Klapper: > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 20:28 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote: > > I'm just curious what the DAT-files are, that are created when I send > > and receive attachments? > > I'd be very surprised if Evolution suddenly created .dat files.

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Pete Biggs
> > OK, so I ran the file command, file attachment.dat, and got this > message: 'very short file (no magic)'. No 'strange' number or strings or > anything! Extremely educational answers from you, even though it's 'far > from Evolution'. Or is it. So 'no magic', 'ey?  The "magic" refers to the

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Pete Biggs
> > Using the Ctr+U command, I got this info: > > --=-cAzVArTuBQDjGRJ48pLs > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-xXDXkoaX8HQyph0FZ2XF" > > > --=-xXDXkoaX8HQyph0FZ2XF > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > The other info I get, but these two must

[Evolution] Is there a way to "refresh" Evolution instead of closing and opening it

2016-02-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Hi, sometimes there are minor issues as the one I experienced right now. Evolution 3.18.4 with POP accounts kept mails in the "Unmatched" folder after removing the one and only search folder. IOW "Edit > Search Folders" was empty, but the "Unmatched" folder contained emails. I wonder if there

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 10:09 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > OK, so I ran the file command, file attachment.dat, and got this > > message: 'very short file (no magic)'. No 'strange' number or > > strings or > > anything! Extremely educational answers from you, even though it's > > 'far > > from

[Evolution] Applying filters fails due to 'empty cache file'

2016-02-11 Thread Robert Munteanu
Hi, Running Evolution 3.18.4 with an EWS and IMAP account ( self-hosted, dovecot 2.2.13 ) . I have defined filters in Evolution for the IMAP account which are applied only to the INBOX. When fiters are applied by Evolution they often fail with Execution of filter '_Emails to me' failed:

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Stig Roar Wangberg
to. den 11. 02. 2016 klokka 09.49 (+) skreiv Pete Biggs: > > There are a lot of info there, and I'm not quite sure what I'm looking > > for. Both the attachments says 'ordinary text document' (translated from > > Norwegian), and the third says PGP/Mime encrypted. > > > > So they are

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Stig Roar Wangberg
to. den 11. 02. 2016 klokka 10.12 (+) skreiv Pete Biggs: > > > > Using the Ctr+U command, I got this info: > > > > --=-cAzVArTuBQDjGRJ48pLs > > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-xXDXkoaX8HQyph0FZ2XF" > > > > > > --=-xXDXkoaX8HQyph0FZ2XF > > Content-Type: text/plain > >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

2016-02-11 Thread Pete Biggs
> What about this, then? Does this say anything about why there's always > two .dat-files attached together with the encrypted attachment? > > --=-FBjrxYQ2/8R5tscH+TLU > Content-Type: application/pgp-encrypted; name="dat.asc" > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dat.asc" >