On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 10:37 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> that "No response: Cancelled" error
Hi,
as I just wrote into another thread, if you use libsoup 2.58.0, then
downgrade to 2.56.0. I've been able to reproduce the issue with 2.58.0,
but 2.56.0 works as before, thus it's a problem in
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 15:22 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 13:17 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > It says: "Failed to connect address book.." and the name of the
> > address book. And the error message says: "No response: Cancelled"
>
> I see, maybe it's related to this one:
>
>
> Thanks. Yes, newer and older are relative terms, but the point is that
> something changed the behavior rather majorly within the past few
> years, and not for the better.
The change was a change of composer that was necessitated by the death
of some backend toolkit (sorry, can't remember
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:13:22 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>Or I just got use to this approach during the years. Each approach has
>its pros and cons.
Hi,
you aren't alone, the developers of the Jack 2 sound server bump the
version after release, too. I'm not aware that anybody else does it
like Jack
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 10:34 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773311
>
> It's already reported as #757504
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757504
>
> and discussed on this list starting at
>
>
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 16:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Not really :). As already sent to the list,
Hi,
you are right, I didn't notice your second message before sending mine,
while your second message invalidated few of my statements, in a good
way.
Bye,
Milan
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 19:03 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 12:07 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > Some years ago I had an older version of Evolution which automatically
> > detected URLs in a plain text message and basically made them preformat
> > ted so as not to break them
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 15:19 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Maybe you could split the difference :) and care about the
> "premature" version bump, the maintainers are willing to add the git
> version.
>
> At https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53840#comment157176 the maintainer
> wrote:
>
> "[snip] I
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:47:02 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>Okay, so Arch is bleeding bleeding bleeding edge distro. Noted. And
>it's the only distribution (I know of) doing it this way. Why would one
>make changes for one ditro, not the opposite? Distro is for users, no?
The Arch Linux policy is to
Milan Crha wrote
> On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 04:20 -0700, Finns1000 wrote:
>> Installed 3.20 (Think it's the newest I can install on Ubuntu 16.04.
>> It did not help.
>
> Hi,
> 3.20 is better than 3.18. And if it brought also evolution-data-server
> of the same version (which it should), then
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 14:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> don't expect that it will be fixed for Arch packages.
Hi,
I see.
> "Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Wednesday, 26 April 2017, 10:21 GMT
> IMHO this is only cosmetic. Distributions package software with
> shitloads of patches and
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 04:20 -0700, Finns1000 wrote:
> Installed 3.20 (Think it's the newest I can install on Ubuntu 16.04.
> It did not help.
Hi,
3.20 is better than 3.18. And if it brought also evolution-data-server
of the same version (which it should), then even better.
> When I
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 13:17 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> It says: "Failed to connect address book.." and the name of the
> address book. And the error message says: "No response: Cancelled"
Hi,
I see, maybe it's related to this one:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781590
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 14:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:17:48 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 09:15 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > > I'm getting dislike Arch. You surely do not have 3.24.2, that had not
> > > been released yet.
> >
> > Understand
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:17:48 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 09:15 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'm getting dislike Arch. You surely do not have 3.24.2, that had not
> > been released yet.
>
> Understand your frustration.. But I see an issue has been created for
> this..
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 04:20 -0700, Finns1000 wrote:
> OK. Thanx!
You might want to configure your Reply options to quote part of the
message you are commenting on (such as I'm doing here). Otherwise
you're forcing people to look at the archives or at other thread
messages to understand what
OK. Thanx!
Installed 3.20 (Think it's the newest I can install on Ubuntu 16.04.
It did not help.
Guess I have to wait for Ubuntu to add a newer version.
The output from debug doesn't tell me mutch. When I klick on a folder
everything seams fine, but it suddenly ends in the middle of an email
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 11:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:15:39 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'm getting dislike Arch. You surely do not have 3.24.2, that had
> > not been released yet.
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53840
Hi,
thanks for filling it upstream,
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:15:39 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>I'm getting dislike Arch. You surely do not have 3.24.2, that had not
>been released yet.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53840
Regards,
Ralf
___
evolution-list mailing list
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 08:55 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> After upgrading to Evolution 3.24.2 on my Arch distro yesterday,
Hi,
I'm getting dislike Arch. You surely do not have 3.24.2, that had not
been released yet. The way the Arch maintainer does his/her duty leads
only to confusion
After upgrading to Evolution 3.24.2 on my Arch distro yesterday, there are some
strangeness occuring:
- Error everytime I open Evolution, "Failed to connect.." to different folders
and contac lists (using EWS)
- I have an IMAP account (Dovecot), where sometimes when I now recieve a new
email,
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 13:00 -0700, Finns1000 wrote:
> The reported error was "Error fetching message info: missing closing
> ')' on fetch response"
Hi,
it means that the server returned requested information in a way which
evolution-data-server's IMAPx didn't expect. The parser is pretty
22 matches
Mail list logo
