Re: [Evolution] Intermittent loss of mail using evolution-ews

2017-09-26 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 15:06 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > For quite some time now I have experienced loss of email in evolution-ews > every 2-3 days. > This loss is per folder. It starts with E having problems marking mails as > read or deleting > mail(they don't go away/sometimes just

[Evolution] Intermittent loss of mail using evolution-ews

2017-09-26 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
For quite some time now I have experienced loss of email in evolution-ews every 2-3 days. This loss is per folder. It starts with E having problems marking mails as read or deleting mail(they don't go away/sometimes just overstrucken). Then some new/all new mails to that folder don't appear in

Re: [Evolution] Bug 738247 - unwanted information disclosure in message headers

2017-09-26 Thread d18jf98rw
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 10:31 AM, Milan Crha wrote:   > On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 09:53 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote: >> Where is the function responsible for helo message? > Hi, > it's here: >

Re: [Evolution] How Ctrl-Alt-J is working

2017-09-26 Thread Ambrogio De Lorenzo
Il giorno ven, 22/09/2017 alle 16.41 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan ha scritto: > On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 17:34 +0200, Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote: > > I submitted 3 bugs on bugzilla, so they can managed separately. > > Please post the bug numbers here in case anyone wants to add to them. 788048

Re: [Evolution] Bug 738247 - unwanted information disclosure in message headers

2017-09-26 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 09:53 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote: > Where is the function responsible for helo message? Hi, it's here: https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/tree/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c?h=gnome-3-24#n1388 > PS. The fact that pretty

Re: [Evolution] Bug 738247 - unwanted information disclosure in message headers

2017-09-26 Thread d18jf98rw
  On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 2:31 AM, Milan Crha wrote:   > On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 17:30 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote: >> local IP is better. > Hi, > maybe. It still exposes some details about the network, like what > internal IP range is in use. exposing internal

Re: [Evolution] Bug 738247 - unwanted information disclosure in message headers

2017-09-26 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 17:30 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote: > local IP is better. Hi, maybe. It still exposes some details about the network, like what internal IP range is in use. I just tried with a Google account and the first Received header contains "localhost.localdomain"