Re: [Evolution] Return Receipts

2006-07-28 Thread Erik Slagter
On di, 2006-07-25 at 12:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: I would like a command line or the ability to go into the config file and set Evolution to request a return receipt for every message. I have many instances where a return receipt is desirable and I frequently forget to insert the

Re: [Evolution] ddmmyy and 24-hour, bis

2006-06-26 Thread Erik Slagter
On za, 2006-06-24 at 15:11 +0200, Dirk van Ormondt wrote: $ LC_TIME=en_GB evolution I do something similar because the American (default) time layout is both ugly and illogical. Now I have set everyhing to nl_NL except for LC_MESSAGES; I cannot get used to programs talking dutch to me :-(

Re: [Evolution] Send and Recieve button grayed out

2006-06-22 Thread Erik Slagter
On do, 2006-06-22 at 16:55 +0800, Harry Lu wrote: Hi, Maybe you made Evolution go offline. Please check the menu under File, and make sure you are running Evolution in online mode. Please note that on FC5 evolution has a dependency on dbus and hal, with the apparent reason to make

Re: [Evolution] Configuring junk mail handling?

2006-06-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:16 +0300, K. Elo wrote: is there any possibilities for configuring the junk mail filtering? I would like to have the possibility for *really* moving those mails away from my IMAP-inboxes into a separate folder, because now these junk mails appear when I use e.g.

Re: [Evolution] Configuring junk mail handling?

2006-06-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 07:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: You really should try to implement this / have this implemented at the mail server level, where you can reject mail before you actually accept it. Not always possible, and no standard means of interaction (tuning) with Evo.

Re: [Evolution] delay when sending mail

2006-06-07 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 02:09 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote: I can dig into it if somebody gives me an idea where and how. As of now nobody did. I have heard that people do not have sending delays. I am glad to hear that. But the reason of me posting to this list is that I have. Unexplained

Re: [Evolution] evolution and large mails

2006-06-07 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 01:03 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote: 256 MB. It should be quite enough for a small-footprint xfce4 (I do not run GNOME), a dozen of xterms and one mail program. Disk activity and even desktop irresponsiveness is not an issue here. They can be to some extent explained by

Re: [Evolution] Downloading pictures

2006-06-06 Thread Erik Slagter
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 11:28 -0400, Rob Campbell wrote: Ok. I thought I could figure it out but I couldn't. How exactly do I do that? Evolution should only download pictures that are not already in the message, btw. You should check that first. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic

Re: [Evolution] Downloading pictures

2006-06-05 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 18:48 -0400, Poohba wrote: I am unable to get many html emails to show pictures. I have the address that the email is coming from in my address book. I have load images if sender is in address book enabled. Why am I not able to get the pictures in the html emails?

Re: [Evolution] evolution and large mails

2006-06-05 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 00:47 +0200, guenther wrote: Regarding your undo feature: I know this is a long standing request in bugzilla. But interestingly, I (personally) never ever wished for such a thing. Since I have deleted mail visible [1], undoing this is like one click or keyboard shortcut

Re: [Evolution] Query: spam filter for use with Evolution in a Fedora Core 5 environment

2006-06-02 Thread Erik Slagter
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 03:10 -0700, H.M. Gladney wrote: Please, what is the recommended spam filter for use with Evolution in a Fedora Core 5 environment? Postfix in proxy spam filter mode + amavis + spamassassin... smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Evolution] Synchronising mailboxes

2006-05-30 Thread Erik Slagter
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 07:59 +1200, Eustace, Glen wrote: I'd rather have to option to not cache at all. My internet connection is fast enough... I think this would be my preferred option as well. I have 100Mbit connections at both locations with desktops and I wouldn't mind the laptop

RE: [Evolution] Synchronising mailboxes

2006-05-30 Thread Erik Slagter
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 10:19 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: if you can open them, then the server didn't actually expunge them yet :) it also means that the server didn't give Evolution any expunge notification untagged responses, which would be WHY they haven't been removed from Evolution's

Re: [Evolution] Evolution can not start dialog

2006-05-29 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 10:08 +0100, Keith Sharp wrote: I also get this repeatedly. I am running a fully up to date FC5: evolution-2.6.1 and evolution-data-server-1.6.1. And I would emphasise that I am not compiling, changing, or installing anything either. Just running the versions that

Re: [Evolution] Synchronising mailboxes

2006-05-29 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 04:38 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: In fact even Send/Receive will not do it, which I for one consider a mistake. After all, if the user has explicitly indicated he's willing to wait for a potentially slow operation, why not take the opportunity of resynching even if

Re: [Evolution] Mail filtering (again )

2006-05-15 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:52 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:17 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:00 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I agree, and this has been mentioned several times in the past. The big problem as I see

Re: [Evolution] Mail filtering (again )

2006-05-13 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:16 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: Run your own mail server. Lots of people do it, and it's not as hard as you think. It also lets you pull mail from your ISP on a regular basis, whether you are logged in or not. Usually (always?) it's run in concert with spamassassin

Re: [Evolution] thawte certificates

2006-05-13 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 09:40 -0700, Paul Lemmons wrote: I have a Thawte email certificate and would like to use it with Evolution 2.6.1. Anybody else out there got this working? Yep. See below :-) smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Evolution] Re: thawte certificates

2006-05-13 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 10:55 -0700, Paul Lemmons wrote: After digging a bit on the net I found the answer to this one at: http://sarwiki.informatik.hu-berlin.de/Thawte_certificate_with_own_private_key There are a number of hoops to jump through but they do work. [signature] Nice, you got

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.6.1 html email issue - backwards typing

2006-05-13 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:10 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 13:43 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 00:01 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote: - rant on - html email is only evil 5-7 years ago. Or, today for systems and users that measure storage and processor

Re: [Evolution] Mail filtering (again )

2006-05-12 Thread Erik Slagter
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 10:18 +0200, Arne Caspari wrote: I seem to miss the point with Evolutions SPAM filtering techniques. Ever since I switched from thunderbird to evolution, I try to get the SPAM filter to work. Using the spamassassin plugin, all I see is that it drastically slows down

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.6.1 html email issue - backwards typing

2006-05-12 Thread Erik Slagter
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 00:01 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote: - rant on - html email is only evil 5-7 years ago. Or, today for systems and users that measure storage and processor time, or bandwidth, in terms that were prevalent 5-7 years ago. Today ... html email is required. It is still

Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk vFolder

2006-04-05 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:55 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: All this 'Junk' stuff on the client side is entirely suboptimal, because any well-run server will be doing it server-side. Indeed. _Determining_ junk belongs on the server.

Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk vFolder

2006-04-05 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 11:38 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 15:31 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:55 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: All this 'Junk' stuff on the client side is entirely

[Evolution] LDAP address book on Active Directory using 2.6

2006-03-31 Thread Erik Slagter
I can't get the LDAP address book working on Active Directory using Evo 2.6. I did all the steps as described in various web documents, on startup evo asks for a password and then either I get a not-so-clear error message or I get no results. I tried port 389 and port 3268. Tethereal shows no

RE: [Evolution] Imap Hula/Evolution

2006-03-31 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 14:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The question is rather: what is wrong with your imap server! I hope nothing :-) It doesn't listen to the imap port. The outlook clients probably use the windows proprietary mail exchange protocol instead. It listen to the imap

Re: [Evolution] Message Priority Button

2006-03-29 Thread Erik Slagter
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 14:19 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: This is yet another Perfect Reason why the toolbar should be user configurable: I don't give a rat's butt about the Evo junk filters, thus, I don't need those buttons. I do, though, see the need for a Reply To List

Re: [Evolution] 2.4.2.1 intermittently ignores X-Spam-Flag

2006-03-20 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 07:12 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Evo only filters messages it considers new. Newness is a state maintained by the IMAP server and means it has not previously reported the message *to any client*, so if you have two or more clients concurrently active on the same

Re: [Evolution] 2.4.2.1 intermittently ignores X-Spam-Flag

2006-03-20 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 11:13 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Solution: either run only one client at a time, or apply filters manually (Ctrl-Y). It would be nice if this feature could be optionally enabled... What feature? This is the way IMAP works, it's not a feature of Evo. The

Re: [Evolution] Load images from Web

2006-03-15 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:10 +0200, Hans wrote: How do I get Evol to load images from the web thats embedded in an email? I am behind a firewall, but can get out with a username and passwd. I have already setup the proxy stuff for KDE and Gnome and have Always load images from the Internet

Re: [Evolution] How to change the line wrap lenght?

2006-03-04 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 12:49 +0100, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: Hi, Eache time I send someone the output of programs or source code Evolution wraps the lines at 80 (?) chars, rendering the text virtually unreadable. Is it possible to change the line length wrap in Evolution, without

Re: [Evolution] problems with certificates..

2006-02-23 Thread Erik Slagter
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 14:33 +0100, Ati Rosselet wrote: Hi.. I had a problem importing certificates in version 2.2.x.. and assumed that it was the verion. I just upgraded to 2.4.1.. and the problem is still there. I am using SuSE 9.3. When I go to import a certificate, it nicely asks for the

Re: [Evolution] GPG support

2006-02-14 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 22:59 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: Speaking of that - I've found that for some reason, when you click the seal, the text in the window that pops up can't be copied and pasted. This is an inconvenience because I would like to be able to search for the public key on a keyserver

Re: [Evolution] Evolution in a Outlook world

2006-01-31 Thread Erik Slagter
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 16:25 +0200, Hans wrote: Ye, Standard Font isn't really my definition of HTML mail fonts? Or is this one of those many users doing something wrong = standard way of doing from now on? Yet it works this way. Evolution uses the gnome application default font for HTML

Re: [Evolution] Filters not working

2006-01-30 Thread Erik Slagter
My old filters work fine, but any new filters added are not executed on received mail - I have to manually Select All Apply Filters to get it to work. Any ideas? Did you check the _order_ in which the filters are applied? Do you have a filter that sets stop processing that matches too much?

Re: [Evolution] Spam Filtering

2006-01-27 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 01:51 +0100, guenther wrote: A hack-ish workaround to train Bayes using Evo is the following: Pick at least 200 non-Junk messages, and keep them in mind. Now mark them as Junk using the Evo UI. Go to your Junk folder, and mark all those non-Junk mail we just abused in a

Re: [Evolution] Spam Filtering

2006-01-27 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 19:27 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote: Ok, but still, won't marking new messages as not-Junk also make SA do the analysis? I'm not 100% sure. But remember, filters err on the side of caution - if it's not sure it won't flag it as junk. Hence telling it something isn't

[Evolution] Evolution and gnome-pilot

2006-01-21 Thread Erik Slagter
I now know why I couldn't find the bug report on gnome-pilot in the evolution bugzilla; it's not there ;-) It's here instead: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157830 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

Re: [Evolution] Looking for libplc4.so

2006-01-10 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 14:03 -0500, Vandor, Steven A wrote: I recently upgraded to NLD9 SP2, and evolution stopped working. It fails at start-up with a message that it cannot find libplc4.so, which resides in the /opt/firefox directory. Does anyone know where evolution is looking? Can I just

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and FC4

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 20:49 +0100, guenther wrote: I've had various issues that caused nasty data loss with evolution 2.4. I assume you filed bugs at bugzilla.gnome.org for all of em, didn't you? At least one. Then I switched back to a known stable version very quickly, I did not want to

Re: [Evolution] Palms and Evolution

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 13:14 -0800, Mindy Fillmore wrote: Anyone have some links or advice in getting evolution to sync with a palm? I have had some luck with kpilot already, and hoping they get out kitchensync soon. Until then, gnomepilot and how to get evolution to sync with kpilot and my

Re: [Evolution] Palms and Evolution

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 17:08 -0500, Kelly J. Morris wrote: Anyone have some links or advice in getting evolution to sync with a palm? Last time I posed this question, folks recommended MultiSync: http://multisync.sourceforge.net/news.php Multisync works well with irmc (mobile phones) but

Re: [Evolution] Re: junk filtering

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:31 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: The problem is when you want to use it to learn ham. Apparently it was not designed for that, it looks like it was designed to undo a previous junk-button-press, because only then something actually happens, being the bayes

Re: [Evolution] Palms and Evolution

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 03:27 -0700, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote: Install gnome-pilot, evolution and evolution-pilot package. Run evolution, and choose Edit-Synchronization Option. Configure your device and conduits. Press hotsync button and you are done. That would be the way, BUT gnome-pilot

Re: [Evolution] Mismatch between subject and message contents

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:22 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: We had something in mind (and experimental code too) to solve this issue. What happens when Evolution is 'shutdown' (closed/quit/whatever) is that it tries to sync up any changes made locally to the Remote IMAP server. We tried

Re: [Evolution] Mismatch between subject and message contents

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 07:16 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I'd still like a specific Sync action though, preferably per-server. AFAIK Send/Receive doesn't do it. That's a nice concept actually. Make an option to select whether sync only fetches new mail but also completely syncs all

Re: [Evolution] Mismatch between subject and message contents

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:56 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: BTW, if I press ^E, will this sync everything on the remote server? It will sync all the deleted messages in the selected folder with the server and Expunge them Is there a specific reason why this doesn't happen automatically?

Re: [Evolution] Mismatch between subject and message contents

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 07:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:30 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:56 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: BTW, if I press ^E, will this sync everything on the remote server? It will sync all the deleted

Re: [Evolution] Palms and Evolution

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 13:35 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: That would be the way, BUT gnome-pilot support for palm has been broken for over a year now and nobody seems to care. On your distro maybe ;) It works fine on Mandriva 2006, I use it every morning.. I compiled and installed the

Re: [Evolution] Mismatch between subject and message contents

2006-01-09 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 10:00 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Is there a specific reason why this doesn't happen automatically? So you can undelete stuff? But it's moved to the trash can anyway? In Evo Trash is a virtual folder (like Junk). The messages are not physically copied when

Re: [Evolution] Mulitple IDs

2006-01-08 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 18:47 +0100, guenther wrote: Reseaching elsewhere, the concensus is that Evolution is NOT what I want/need. Evolution is an Outlook alternative. Outlook never met my requirements, and I would not leave Eudora. No. Evolution is *not* an Outlook alternative in the

Re: [Evolution] Mismatch between subject and message contents

2006-01-08 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 18:54 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: But Evo takes a long time to exit (30 seconds or so) as it waits until exit time to purge and write out all mail folders. Most distros don't give processes nearly this long to exit. True, and in fact some versions used to hang

Re: [Evolution] Import from csv

2006-01-08 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 23:55 +0100, guenther wrote: Note: The composer only shows contacts for auto-completion, if they actually happen to have an email address set. Please check your imported contacts -- do they have an email address set, if you open 'em in the contact editor? Ow, completely

Re: [Evolution] Mismatch between subject and message contents

2006-01-08 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:27 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:32 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Depends what you mean by shut down. The shutdown utility on Linux sends a signal which processes can trap and gives them a little time to clean up. Only then does it kill them

Re: [Evolution] junk filtering

2006-01-08 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 21:28 +0100, guenther wrote: Depends on version and distribution. A good starting point is to find the file local.cf inside some spamassassin directory (wherever that may be on your system). It usually resides in /etc/spamassassin or /etc/mail/spamassassin. Well,

Re: [Evolution] Re: junk filtering

2006-01-08 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 16:06 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: And how about this one: It seems that the not junk button only can mark messages not junk that have been marked as junk previously (although it doesn't say anything like this). reading your message, i could use both junk and not junk

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and FC4

2006-01-08 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 19:12 +0100, J.L. Blom wrote: Maybe a stupid question but can anybody give me the reason why Fedora update ignores evolution (but updates e.g. Ooo)? I'm still using 2.2.3 and I have the feeling that a lot f wonderful things (but also nasty things!) are not in this version

Re: [Evolution] junk filtering

2006-01-06 Thread Erik Slagter
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 22:31 -0500, David Bicking wrote: Can anybody point me to documentation on how evolution handles junk mail? Meaning what rules it is using. As near as I can tell I have the function turned on, and as near as I can tell, it has never flagged anything as junk on its own. I

Re: [Evolution] junk filtering

2006-01-06 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 12:46 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep. Blame spamassassin ;-) This is used by evolution to filter junk. Tweak spamassassin to your likings and evolution will follow. When activating the Include remote tests, does it activate Spamassassin only? AFAIK this actually

Re: [Evolution] Using Address Book as white list

2006-01-06 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 12:01 +, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 11:03 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote: On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: Is there a way of setting up a message filter that says if the sender is not in my address book

Re: [Evolution] Re: junk filtering

2006-01-06 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 05:26 -0800, David Bicking wrote: So is spamassassin a seperate package? Would it be listed as a depencency that would be installed when evolution was installed? From what I read, it sounded like the filtering was built in to evolution, not an external call to another

Re: [Evolution] Will evolution send a certificate when asked for ?

2006-01-04 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 15:42 +0100, Franck Routier wrote: thanks Erik for your response. In fact Postfix' logs indicate that Evolution is not sending a certificate. So my question is more : Is Evolution supposed to be able to do it (and then what is the magic) ? or is it just not a feature

Re: [Evolution] Wrong timezone calculation?

2006-01-02 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 15:23 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 10:53 +, Pete Biggs wrote: [snip] What he means is that all time zone info is obtained from the system and is not held within Evo. Perhaps CET or JST means something different to the system than what

Re: [Evolution] Wrong timezone calculation?

2006-01-02 Thread Erik Slagter
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 13:19 +0100, Terje BrĂ¥ten wrote: skylla erik:~ $ zdump JST JST Mon Jan 2 12:01:29 2006 JST skylla erik:~ $ zdump CET CET Mon Jan 2 13:01:34 2006 CET That indeed seems to be the case. I don't know how to fix it though... It seems the definition for JST on FC4 is

Re: [Evolution] sa-learn ??

2006-01-01 Thread Erik Slagter
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 17:23 -0500, William Case wrote: Got some confidence building questions -- just checking before I try something that is new to me -- manually adding spam filters. I have almost no spam anymore thanks to spamassassin and my cable IP's spam control. However, I do have

Re: [Evolution] Wrong timezone calculation?

2005-12-28 Thread Erik Slagter
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 21:44 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 10:18 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote: Evolution seems to calculate the time zone from JST to CST wrong? Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:57:53 JST (01:57 CET) It seems to think that CET is only one hour apart from JST

Re: [Evolution] Mulitple IDs

2005-12-28 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 12:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Evolution looks slick, but not my solution. Not a replacement for all that I do with Eudora that I still cannot do with Outlook. That is very well possible, or you're thinking in fixed solutions; maybe evolution can handle your

Re: [Evolution] Mulitple IDs

2005-12-28 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 15:02 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: [ ... ] Hmmm, at first sight this looks a bit like my situation. I manage home and work mail accounts from evolution. Mail that gets sent to my work account, and I reply to, automatically has my work's origin address and my work's

Re: [Evolution] Mulitple IDs

2005-12-28 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 15:35 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I don't have this problem, because the mail comes in at different IMAP accounts. And you leave the mail in the IMAP folders? Not local store? I have some filters that move all mail to the imap server at home (so in a sense, this is