On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 23:46 +0200, Tom wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 10.04.2016, 17:26 +0100 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 15:13 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 10:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Don't send multipart
On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 23:36 +0200, Tom wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 10.04.2016, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> > On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 10:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > Don't send multipart messages that contain HTML to mailing lists.
> > > It's common practise to send plain text mails
Am Sonntag, den 10.04.2016, 17:26 +0100 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 15:13 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 10:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > >
> > > Don't send multipart messages that contain HTML to mailing lists.
> > > It's common practise to
Am Sonntag, den 10.04.2016, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 10:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Don't send multipart messages that contain HTML to mailing lists.
> > It's common practise to send plain text mails only.
>
> For future reference, could this be expressed
On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 15:13 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 10:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > Don't send multipart messages that contain HTML to mailing lists.
> > It's common practise to send plain text mails only.
> For future reference, could this be expressed in a
On Sun, 2016-04-10 at 10:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Don't send multipart messages that contain HTML to mailing lists.
> It's common practise to send plain text mails only.
For future reference, could this be expressed in a friendlier way?
"Don't do..." could also be "Could you please avoid
