Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-27 Thread Art Alexion
2009 Subject: Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:55 -0400, Robert Seward wrote: This is a silly question.. What are the advantages of removing bonobo as a dependency for Evolution? See http://mbarnes.livejournal.com/2606.html Matthew Barnes

Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-27 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:32 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: From reading your article, it appears that the major difference for end users will be that developers will be better able to fix bugs. I hope so. And it will let us add some nice enhancements that we've been blocked on for years. Editable

Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-27 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:57 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: Well, this is not the only possible difference for end users. If developers of extensions (i.e. evolution-rss, evolution-jescs, etc.) don't jump on the bandwagon before the GA release of evolution sans bonobo, some users will be

Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-27 Thread Reid Thompson
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:57 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: the major difference for end users will be that developers will be better able to fix bugs. will MAPI be building straight out of the evo tree? will it still be dependent upon unreleased SAMBA 4? Boils down to two concerns, will I

Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-27 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 08:45 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: will MAPI be building straight out of the evo tree? will it still be dependent upon unreleased SAMBA 4? Yes and yes. No changes to evolution-mapi. evolution-exchange, on the other hand, is severely broken right now since it leans

Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-27 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
Does this mean your merge won't be default in 2.28, but in 3.0? ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-27 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 00:45 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote: Does this mean your merge won't be default in 2.28, but in 3.0? Correct. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org

Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-26 Thread Robert Seward
This is a silly question.. What are the advantages of removing bonobo as a dependency for Evolution? Thanks, Rob On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 16:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: This is a heads up that I'm going to attempt to finally merge the kill-bonobo branch this coming weekend (August 29/30).

Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-26 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:55 -0400, Robert Seward wrote: This is a silly question.. What are the advantages of removing bonobo as a dependency for Evolution? See http://mbarnes.livejournal.com/2606.html Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-list mailing

[Evolution] Heads Up: Merging kill-bonobo this weekend

2009-08-25 Thread Matthew Barnes
This is a heads up that I'm going to attempt to finally merge the kill-bonobo branch this coming weekend (August 29/30). For those who haven't heard me yammering on about this for the past year, the kill-bonobo branch is a major rewrite of Evolution's core architecture with the primary goal of