Re: [Evolution] Ways to reduce IMAP caching?

2015-04-30 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 12:57 +0200, Nico Rikken wrote: So the final solution was to ditch automatic junk filtering. Junk filtering means actually reading the message, so yes. poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your

Re: [Evolution] Ways to reduce IMAP caching?

2015-04-29 Thread Pete Biggs
Looking at the textfiles in the cache, it features the full messages including the attachments (within the text). So there seems to be a mismatch between the supposed behavior of only downloading headers and the actual status of having downloaded all messages. Evolution will cache any

Re: [Evolution] Ways to reduce IMAP caching?

2015-04-29 Thread Nico Rikken
Dear Andre, Normally not: https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/mail-working-offline.html I thought so, that's why I explicitly didn't activate this feature. Looking at the textfiles in the cache, it features the full messages including the attachments (within the text). So there

[Evolution] Ways to reduce IMAP caching?

2015-04-29 Thread Nico Rikken
Dear all, Having just changed my default e-mail infrastructure from POP to a single machine, to IMAP shared between multiple computers and smartphones, I noticed Evolution is keeping a large local cache file. INBOX/cur/ amounts to 5.2 GB, about as much as all the e-mail stored via POP previously.

Re: [Evolution] Ways to reduce IMAP caching?

2015-04-29 Thread Tom
Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2015, 10:16 +0200 schrieb Nico Rikken: Dear Andre, Normally not: https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/mail-working-offline.html I thought so, that's why I explicitly didn't activate this feature. Looking at the textfiles in the cache, it features the