Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:38 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:27:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > I guess the request for feature enhancement should be filed against > > the composer and not against the mailing list actions plugin, right? > > The composer perhaps wasn't the

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:27:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >I guess the request for feature enhancement should be filed against the >composer and not against the mailing list actions plugin, right? The composer perhaps wasn't the right choice, since the box doesn't appear in the editor, but when

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:27 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 10:10 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > Can you file a BZ report please? Remember to quote the number here > > in > > case anyone wants to follow up. > Somebody needs to follow up, since I won't do it, because

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 10:10 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Can you file a BZ report please? Remember to quote the number here in > case anyone wants to follow up. Somebody needs to follow up, since I won't do it, because I'm not a digest user. I guess the request for feature enhancement

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 10:16 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:37:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > The other thing I notice is that the menu offers Reply to Sender > > and > > Reply to All, but not Reply to List, which is the preferred way to > > reply to list

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:37:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >The other thing I notice is that the menu offers Reply to Sender and >Reply to All, but not Reply to List, which is the preferred way to >reply to list messages. Not sure if that's a bug or a necessary feature >due to some limitation

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 17:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Patrick, if you don't want to temporarily change the settings of your > account, then consider to subscribe by two test accounts. By one > account > receive a plain text digest, by the other receive a MIME digest. It > seems to be good, if

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

Patrick, if you don't want to temporarily change the settings of your account, then consider to subscribe by two test accounts. By one account receive a plain text digest, by the other receive a MIME digest. It seems to be good, if you would "experience" the two digests modes yourself. ;) Ralf

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 11:44 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > From what I can see in the image you appear to be looking in the wrong > place. Don't select anything from the top-level menus. Simply point at > the body of a digest message and right-click. You should get a pop-up > menu of actions,

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 17:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > Not sure what box you mean. The Reply to Digest action is on the > > right- click menu when focused on the digest message. I'm using > > 3.18.5.2 and don't have any digest messages to look at. > > > > > > > > "If you wish to reply

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

> Not sure what box you mean. The Reply to Digest action is on the > right- click menu when focused on the digest message. I'm using > 3.18.5.2 and don't have any digest messages to look at. > > "If you wish to reply to a component message, use your mailer's > > facility for this. In Evolution:

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 06:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > My apologies, I'm still doing the digest experiment and didn't > receive > the latest mails, but read them in the archive. > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2016-April/msg00083.ht > ml > > > > > Don't worry Milan, I

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

My apologies, I'm still doing the digest experiment and didn't receive the latest mails, but read them in the archive. https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2016-April/msg00083.html > Don't worry Milan, I wasn't proposing to change the *default list > format* to digest, but to change

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 18:54 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:27 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > The user can set his own preferred format on the settings page, > > however > > the current default is indeed set to Plain Text. Thanks for > > pointing > > this out. > >

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:27 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > The user can set his own preferred format on the settings page, however > the current default is indeed set to Plain Text. Thanks for pointing > this out. > > Unless anyone objects, I propose changing it to MIME. Hi, once

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 07:51 -0700, Brewster Gillett wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:27 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > > However as I've said before, the justification for using Digest > > mode on > > lists has virtually disappeared. If at all possible people should > > avoid > >

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:27 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > However as I've said before, the justification for using Digest mode on > lists has virtually disappeared. If at all possible people should avoid > it. It belongs to the days of slow dial-up modems. I'm not saying we > should

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 14:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Speaking about Evolution 3.20.1, in the right upper corner of an > attached mail, there's a box to select to reply. Using the right menu > it > would not reply like above, it would reply with the subject > "Re: evolution-list Digest, Vol

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 11:36 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > 2) Never reply to list digests. If you want to reply to a message > > within a digest, use the right-click menu in Evolution. > Hi, > > the default digest mode seems to

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 11:36 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > 2) Never reply to list digests. If you want to reply to a message > > within a digest, use the right-click menu in Evolution. > > Hi, > > the default digest mode seems to be

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 11:36 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > 2) Never reply to list digests. If you want to reply to a message > within a digest, use the right-click menu in Evolution. Hi, the default digest mode seems to be "Plain Text", at least this is what was checked by my account

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 19:33 -0430, Josegregorio Coffi wrote: > file:///home/josecoffi/Escritorio/15-1_010.jpeg > pasalo ha otras personas Please: 1) Don't top-post. 2) Never reply to list digests. If you want to reply to a message within a digest, use the right-click menu in Evolution. 3) Use

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10

file:///home/josecoffi/Escritorio/15-1_010.jpeg pasalo ha otras personas 2016-04-12 11:17 GMT-04:30, evolution-list-requ...@gnome.org : > Send evolution-list mailing list submissions to > evolution-list@gnome.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the