On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote:
What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. Find my answer
in the message below? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few
msg. on the list, about email-list etiquette, but unfortunately I
haven't save the msg. for reference.
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:59 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote:
What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. Find my answer
in the message below? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few
msg. on the list, about email-list
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:59 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I think it's best not to do this. If you're really concerned about the
intelligence of the recipient, just try to keep your first citation nice
and short, so that your first reply is clearly visible.
This is working well for me.
I
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 21:56 -0700, Brewster Gillett wrote:
Thanks Patrick Answers interspersed with quotes
below. is the term I was looking for.
That should not be construed as sanctioning the placement of the
backquotes
*before* your answer - the (trimmed) backquotes should always come
What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. Find my answer
in the message below? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few
msg. on the list, about email-list etiquette, but unfortunately I
haven't save the msg. for reference.
Thanks
nomnex
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote:
What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. Find my answer
in the message below? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few
msg. on the list, about email-list etiquette, but unfortunately I
haven't save the msg. for reference.
I
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 07:39 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote:
What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. Find my
answer
in the message below? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in
few
msg. on the list, about email-list
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 08:20 +0900, nomnex wrote:
I don't really understand the question. Always reply to all
messages
with proper inline [aka bottom ? posting] responses and quoting. It
seems absurd to always say see below at the top of every message.
I just need to correct English
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 08:20 +0900, nomnex wrote:
Many people do not read quotes in the messages
by the simple fact they are so accustomed to top posting answers (in the
Outlook way).
bg:
Mild correction, sir - top posting is not The Outlook Way.
Outlook will accommodate proper bottom posting
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 17:32 -0700, Brewster Gillett wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 08:20 +0900, nomnex wrote:
Many people do not read quotes in the messages
by the simple fact they are so accustomed to top posting answers (in the
Outlook way).
bg:
Mild correction, sir - top posting is
If I read what you say literally, it doesn't make sense to me. Why on
Earth would your answer be in quotes?
I meant: answer under the quotes (...) glad you could decode the correct
meaning.
A suitable phrase for you want is: Answers interspersed with quotes
below.
poc
Thanks Patrick
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 08:20 +0900, nomnex wrote:
Many people do not read quotes in the messages
by the simple fact they are so accustomed
to top posting answers (in the Outlook way).
bg:
Mild correction, sir - top posting is not The Outlook Way.
Outlook will accommodate
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 10:42 +0900, nomnex wrote:
If I read what you say literally, it doesn't make sense to me. Why on
Earth would your answer be in quotes?
snip
Thanks Patrick Answers interspersed with quotes
below. is the term I was looking for.
nomnex
bg:
In this instance I
13 matches
Mail list logo
