On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 17:35 -0700, bg wrote:
> Is it possible that Evo imposes a limitation on the number of
> addresses that the BCC field is allowed to contain? I have had a
> couple of recent cases where a list was truncated from its original
> count ???
Hi,
I'm not aware of any such li
>
> Is it possible that Evo imposes a limitation on the number of addresses that
> the BCC field
> is allowed to contain? I have had a couple of recent cases where a list was
> truncated from
> its original count ???
How many addresses / characters does it cut off at?
> I find no mention of
3.18.5.2 on Ubunto 16.04
Is it possible that Evo imposes a limitation on the number of addresses
that the BCC field
is allowed to contain? I have had a couple of recent cases where a list
was truncated fromĀ
its original count ??? I find no mention of such a limit in the "HELP"
files, but I can im