I'm just wondering if the folder scalability issues will be resolved for
the next major release (2.6.28)?
For reference, I filed bug 589245 in bugzilla back on July 21 and the
only response was a recommendation to use the patch in bug 564388 which
I reported I am already using.
Even with that
2009/8/23 Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca:
I'm just wondering if the folder scalability issues will be resolved for
the next major release (2.6.28)?
I would not hold my breath -- it has been like this for the several
years that I struggled trying to use it. Access to an Exchange mailbox
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 12:03 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I'm just wondering if the folder scalability issues will be resolved for
the next major release (2.6.28)?
For reference, I filed bug 589245 in bugzilla back on July 21 and the
only response was a recommendation to use the patch in
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 13:10 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
2009/8/23 Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca:
I'm just wondering if the folder scalability issues will be resolved for
the next major release (2.6.28)?
I would not hold my breath -- it has been like this for the several
years
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Patrick O'Callaghanp...@usb.ve wrote:
I don't use Exchange so I don't really have anything useful to say, but
just as a general comment, large means different things to different
people so you might want to be more specific.
1 - 2 GB during the time I was
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 21:38 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
I don't use Exchange so I don't really have anything useful to say,
but
just as a general comment, large means different things to
different
people so you might want to be more specific.
1 - 2 GB during the time I was struggling
