Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2012-01-12 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 18:25 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote: Sorting config is good, but threads stay as they are. How should I check if the gconf is good ? Hi, probably only with gdb, and even that may work only if the corresponding variable is not optimized out during the compile. In

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2012-01-12 Thread Bastien Durel
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2012 à 10:40 +0100, Milan Crha a écrit : On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 18:25 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote: Sorting config is good, but threads stay as they are. How should I check if the gconf is good ? Hi, probably only with gdb, and even that may work only if the

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2012-01-12 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 11:26 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote: Well ... maybe I had to close evolution with --force-close, and not only with the WM close button: today (after a shutdown) it works as expected. Hi, good. Thanks for your time, and sorry for this mistake. I do not think it's

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2012-01-11 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:11 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote: Since the last upgrade to Evolution 3.2.1 (was 2.32 I think), threads was pushed to end of the list when a new mail was inserted into them (thread date was the last message's date). Now thez left where they lie, so when a mail arrives in

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2012-01-11 Thread Bastien Durel
Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 10:46 +0100, Milan Crha a écrit : On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:11 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote: Since the last upgrade to Evolution 3.2.1 (was 2.32 I think), threads was pushed to end of the list when a new mail was inserted into them (thread date was the last

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2012-01-11 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 11:35 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote: The thread_latest is on. I unchecked it, restarted evo: no change. re-checked it, restarted evo: no change again. thread_list and thread_expand are true too, thread_subject is false. Hi, hmm, then I may guess that there is

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2012-01-11 Thread Bastien Durel
Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 12:10 +0100, Milan Crha a écrit : On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 11:35 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote: The thread_latest is on. I unchecked it, restarted evo: no change. re-checked it, restarted evo: no change again. thread_list and thread_expand are true too,

[Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2012-01-10 Thread Bastien Durel
Hello, Since the last upgrade to Evolution 3.2.1 (was 2.32 I think), threads was pushed to end of the list when a new mail was inserted into them (thread date was the last message's date). Now thez left where they lie, so when a mail arrives in a 6-month-old thread of my OS-lists folder, I have

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2012-01-10 Thread Zan Lynx
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:11 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote: Hello, Since the last upgrade to Evolution 3.2.1 (was 2.32 I think), threads was pushed to end of the list when a new mail was inserted into them (thread date was the last message's date). Now thez left where they lie, so when a mail

[Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2007-02-09 Thread Nicolas Bock
Hello list, I sort my INBOX by date and group messages by thread. A new message which is not part of a thread gets placed as expected at the bottom of the message list. However, a new message which is part of a thread gets placed into the thread, and the thread does not move to the bottom of the

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2007-02-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 07:32 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote: Hello list, I sort my INBOX by date and group messages by thread. A new message which is not part of a thread gets placed as expected at the bottom of the message list. However, a new message which is part of a thread gets placed into

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2007-02-09 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
In 2.8.x onwards, if the thread is collapsed, the date of the thread is considered to be the date of the most recent message in the thread. But if it is expanded, it doesnt follow this. You can collapse all threads (View-Collapse All Threads) may be once in a while to know, if any new messages

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2007-02-09 Thread Nicolas Bock
I would prefer if it would also sort the uncollapsed threads as well though. Do you know whether this is going to be implemented at some point? Should I open a bug report? nick On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 23:40 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: In 2.8.x onwards, if the thread is collapsed, the date

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2007-02-09 Thread Reid Thompson
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 12:10 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote: I would prefer if it would also sort the uncollapsed threads as well though. Do you know whether this is going to be implemented at some point? Should I open a bug report? nick I second this...

Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads

2007-02-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 14:15 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: And I third it and I am sure there are forty-eleven people behind me. But seriously, the hard work has been done if a collapsed thread will sort by the newest message in it surely. It sounds like the treatment of expanded threads is more