Its beter, if it is stopped. Or make sure that no other task [filtering,
downloading] is in progress while you are doing this. It might lock the
db.
-Srini.
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 15:02 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 09:56 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 09:56 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
http://www.gnome.org/~sragavan/evolution-rebuild-summarydb
It vacuums the db. I'm looking to do it programmatic, but it makes lot
of difference.
Does evolution have to be stopped to do this?
b.
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 15:02 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 09:56 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
http://www.gnome.org/~sragavan/evolution-rebuild-summarydb
It vacuums the db. I'm looking to do it programmatic, but it makes lot
of difference.
Does evolution
Sqlite db grows odd and slow over a period of months due to table
recreation etc, so you can try the following script once in a while
http://www.gnome.org/~sragavan/evolution-rebuild-summarydb
It vacuums the db. I'm looking to do it programmatic, but it makes lot
of difference.
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 09:40 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
Sqlite db grows odd and slow over a period of months due to table
recreation etc, so you can try the following script once in a while
http://www.gnome.org/~sragavan/evolution-rebuild-summarydb
It vacuums the db. I'm looking to
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 17:08 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Is for evolution to be as stable as it was pre-2.24.0.
It's strange. I see a few people on this list saying how unstable Evo
has been since 2.24.0 but to be honest I find exactly the opposite. I
run both 2.22.x under FC9 and 2.24.x
On 03/02/09 02:20, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
That's why I have some dozen or more bugs filed.
Doesn't it occur to you that giving actual references to these bugs
would add weight to your message?
poc
___
Evolution-list mailing list
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Doesn't it occur to you that giving actual references to these bugs
would add weight to your message?
Well, I don't need your condescension thanks very much. There is really
no point to rehashing open bugzilla bugs here.
I was
On 03/02/09 04:46, Pete Biggs wrote:
I think what I'm trying to say is that my feeling is that generally Evo
is not less stable now than it was before - there would be much, much
more grouching here if it were - but I get the impression that either
some edge cases are suffering or there are some
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 03/02/09 02:20, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
That's why I have some dozen or more bugs filed.
Doesn't it occur to you that giving actual references to these bugs
would add weight to your message?
I agree; when I was trying to
On 03/02/09 09:19, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Doesn't it occur to you that giving actual references to these bugs
would add weight to your message?
Well, I don't need your condescension thanks very much. There is really
no point to
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:24 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
also have problems with Storing Folder (someone on the Fedora list
posted a similar complaint and now has a BZ entry for it: 570294).
I think I may have the Storing Folder issue as well. Typically happens
after using Evo 2.24
On 03/02/09 14:01, Han Pilmeyer wrote:
I think I may have the Storing Folder issue as well. Typically happens
after using Evo 2.24 for about a day. Everything I do just seems to
queue up in the pending tasks as the bottom of the screen. Even exiting
queues up as well. Feels like it runs out of
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 14:23 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 03/02/09 14:01, Han Pilmeyer wrote:
I think I may have the Storing Folder issue as well. Typically happens
after using Evo 2.24 for about a day. Everything I do just seems to
queue up in the pending tasks as the bottom of the
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 19:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 14:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 14:23 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 03/02/09 14:01, Han Pilmeyer wrote:
I think I may have the Storing Folder issue as well. Typically
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 14:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 14:23 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 03/02/09 14:01, Han Pilmeyer wrote:
I think I may have the Storing Folder issue as well. Typically happens
after using Evo 2.24 for about a day. Everything I do
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:24 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 03/02/09 04:46, Pete Biggs wrote:
I think what I'm trying to say is that my feeling is that generally Evo
is not less stable now than it was before - there would be much, much
more grouching here if it were - but I get the
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 03/02/09 04:46, Pete Biggs wrote:
I think what I'm trying to say is that my feeling is that generally
Evo is not less stable now than it was before - there would be much,
much more grouching here if it were - but I get the impression that
either some edge cases
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 17:08 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Is for evolution to be as stable as it was pre-2.24.0.
As valiant as a wish that it may be, it doesn't help the developers fix
bugs or help others assist you with issues you may be experiencing.
What problems are you having with it?
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 21:39 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote:
As valiant as a wish that it may be, it doesn't help the developers fix
bugs or help others assist you with issues you may be experiencing.
Of course it doesn't.
What problems are you having with it?
I'm not going to describe them all
20 matches
Mail list logo
