Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
On 23 May 2001 17:42:39 -0400, Fernando Pereira wrote: It works for RH 6.2, maybe it's a packaging problem with RH 7.1. What's suspicious here is that your file output is quite different from what I get $ file addressbook.db addressbook.db: Berkeley DB 2.X Hash/Little Endian (Version 5, Logical sequence number: file - 0, offset - 0, Bucket Size 4096, Overflow Point 3, Last Freed 0, Max Bucket 5, High Mask 0x7, Low Mask 0x3, Fill Factor 0, Number of Keys 65) although the alleged version is the same. My db package is as follows $ rpm -qa | grep '^db' db3-3.1.17-4.6x I'm almost positive you're using db2. Version 5 is the db2 version. Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
On 24 May 2001 08:21:21 -0400, Fernando Pereira wrote: On 24 May 2001 07:01:11 -0400, Christopher James Lahey wrote: On 23 May 2001 17:42:39 -0400, Fernando Pereira wrote: After some investigation, I think I agree. There's a whole mess of db versions and symbolic links to db versions in /lib: -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 788401 Jan 15 10:49 libdb-2.1.3.so -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1485823 Dec 1 18:02 libdb-3.1.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 15 Sep 26 2000 libdb.so.2 - libdb1-2.1.3.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 14 Sep 26 2000 libdb.so.3 - libdb-2.1.3.so -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 221411 Jan 15 10:49 libdb1-2.1.3.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 15 Sep 26 2000 libdb1.so.2 - libdb1-2.1.3.so and /usr/lib -rw-r--r--1 root root 3684062 Jan 15 10:49 libdb.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Sep 26 2000 libdb.so - ../../lib/libdb.so.3 -rw-r--r--1 root root 972154 Jan 15 10:49 libdb1.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 21 Sep 26 2000 libdb1.so - ../../lib/libdb1.so.2 -rw-r--r--1 root root 977006 Jan 15 10:49 libdb1_p.a -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1760542 Dec 1 18:02 libdb_cxx-3.1.so -rw-r--r--1 root root 3702978 Jan 15 10:49 libdb_p.a As you can see, /usr/lib/libdb.so links to a version 2 binary. What library file names is Evo SUPPOSED to use with the current library version?? My lib directories are not as complicated, but are also spread between /lib and /usr/lib. /usr/lib was in my /etc/ld.so.conf, /lib was not. I added /lib into /etc/ld.so.conf, but that didn't help. My lib directories - [root@localhost lib]# ls -l /usr/lib/libdb* -r--r--r--1 root root 7163034 Aug 30 2000 /usr/lib/libdb-3.1.a -rw-r--r--1 root root 625 Aug 30 2000 /usr/lib/libdb-3.1.la lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 May 24 07:12 /usr/lib/libdb-3.1.so - libdb.so.old lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 May 22 10:24 /usr/lib/libdb.so.2 - libdb1.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 May 22 10:24 /usr/lib/libdb.so.3 - libdb2.so.3 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1516058 May 24 07:01 /usr/lib/libdb.so.old -rw-r--r--1 root root 779678 Aug 17 2000 /usr/lib/libdb1.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 May 22 10:21 /usr/lib/libdb1.so - libdb1.so.2 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root60752 May 22 10:24 /usr/lib/libdb1.so.2 -rw-r--r--1 root root 3203846 May 22 10:23 /usr/lib/libdb2.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 May 22 10:22 /usr/lib/libdb2.so - libdb2.so.3 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 282064 May 22 10:24 /usr/lib/libdb2.so.3 -rw-r--r--1 root root 649 Aug 30 2000 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-3.1.la -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1733838 May 22 10:23 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-3.1.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 May 22 10:23 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl.so - libdb_tcl-3.1.so [root@localhost /lib]# ls -l /lib/libdb* -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1516058 May 22 10:47 /lib/libdb-3.1.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 May 22 10:47 /lib/libdb.so - libdb-3.1.so How any of this ever works is a mystery. linux libs from what I've learned work through the library registration file /etc/ld.so.conf. If you want libraries used, list the directory in there, and run ldconfig (like lilo is run after messing with the /boot directory. -- regs rupert ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
On 23 May 2001 16:27:10 -0500, John Sundberg wrote: Redhat 7.1 evolution .10 - 2 (from Redcarpet today) [jdsundberg@bear Contacts]$ file addressbook.db addressbook.db: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order) [jdsundberg@bear Contacts]$ db_dump185 addressbook.db db_dump185: addressbook.db: Invalid argument [jdsundberg@bear Contacts]$ db_dump addressbook.db db_dump: addressbook.db: hash version 5 requires a version upgrade db_dump: open: addressbook.db: DB_OLDVERSION: Database requires a version upgrade If I try and create a new Contact - I can fill out the form but nothing appears to be created in the the addressbook.db You have a db2 version database. RH7 packages use db3. These instructions will only work on RH7.x: In your contacts directory run: killev cp addressbook.db addressbook.db.bkup db_upgrade addressbook.db Try again. Once you're satisfied that it's working again, you can delete the backup at your leisure. Thanks, Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
On 23 May 2001 22:01:20 -0400, Rupert Heesom wrote: Hi! I've just upgraded my Evo to evolution-0.10-ximian.2 hoping to get my addressbook back, but still no addressbook. What distro are you on? Thanks, Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
Redhat 7.1 evolution .10 - 2 (from Redcarpet today) [jdsundberg@bear Contacts]$ file addressbook.db addressbook.db: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order) [jdsundberg@bear Contacts]$ db_dump185 addressbook.db db_dump185: addressbook.db: Invalid argument [jdsundberg@bear Contacts]$ db_dump addressbook.db db_dump: addressbook.db: hash version 5 requires a version upgrade db_dump: open: addressbook.db: DB_OLDVERSION: Database requires a version upgrade If I try and create a new Contact - I can fill out the form but nothing appears to be created in the the addressbook.db Any ideas? -John -- John Sundberg Kinetic Data, Inc. 404 Snelling Ave. S. St. Paul, MN 55105 Work: 651 695 8566 Fax: 651 695 8577 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
It works for RH 6.2, maybe it's a packaging problem with RH 7.1. What's suspicious here is that your file output is quite different from what I get $ file addressbook.db addressbook.db: Berkeley DB 2.X Hash/Little Endian (Version 5, Logical sequence number: file - 0, offset - 0, Bucket Size 4096, Overflow Point 3, Last Freed 0, Max Bucket 5, High Mask 0x7, Low Mask 0x3, Fill Factor 0, Number of Keys 65) although the alleged version is the same. My db package is as follows $ rpm -qa | grep '^db' db3-3.1.17-4.6x Have you checked yours? -- F ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
Hi! I've just upgraded my Evo to evolution-0.10-ximian.2 hoping to get my addressbook back, but still no addressbook. My file addressbook.db looks similar to yours - [rupert@localhost Contacts]$ file addressbook.db addressbook.db: Berkeley DB 2.X Hash/Little Endian (Version 5, Logical sequence number: file - 0, offset - 0, Bucket Size 4096, Overflow Point 2, Last Freed 0, Max Bucket 3, High Mask 0x3, Low Mask 0x1, Fill Factor 14, Number of Keys 0) However, having a look at this thread, your db version is newer than mine. When I ask for db versions, I get the following - [rupert@localhost Contacts]$ rpm -qa | grep '^db' db3-3.1.14-6 db2-2.4.14-4 db2-devel-2.4.14-4 db1-1.85-4 db1-devel-1.85-4 db3-devel-3.1.14-6 db3-utils-3.1.14-6 First of all, it looks like I've got far too many versions. I need to dump some of them somehow. Next, my db3 version is 3.1.14, not your 3.1.17. How do I go about updating this stuff??? On 23 May 2001 17:42:39 -0400, Fernando Pereira wrote: $ file addressbook.db addressbook.db: Berkeley DB 2.X Hash/Little Endian (Version 5, Logical sequence number: file - 0, offset - 0, Bucket Size 4096, Overflow Point 3, Last Freed 0, Max Bucket 5, High Mask 0x7, Low Mask 0x3, Fill Factor 0, Number of Keys 65) although the alleged version is the same. My db package is as follows $ rpm -qa | grep '^db' db3-3.1.17-4.6x -- regs rupert ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
