Re: Evolve with named branches vs Evolve with topic branches

2019-06-12 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 3/12/19 10:54 AM, Faheem Mitha wrote: Yes, I realise that changing the phase of csets would suffice - that's one of the side-effects of pushing to a publishing repos. I was thinking that maybe I could just run an automated job to periodically make all csets public for all csets that were at

Re: Evolve with named branches vs Evolve with topic branches

2019-03-12 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, Aurélien Campéas wrote: Hi Faheem, Hi Aurélien, I believe the point of topics is to emulate a "feature branch" workflow familiar to git users (the equivalent of a publication there would be to rebase over develop or master). You need not "push to a publishing repo"

Re: Evolve with named branches vs Evolve with topic branches

2019-03-12 Thread Aurélien Campéas
Hi Faheem, I believe the point of topics is to emulate a "feature branch" workflow familiar to git users (the equivalent of a publication there would be to rebase over develop or master). You need not "push to a publishing repo" to drop the topics (this is a part of the tutorial I disagree

Evolve with named branches vs Evolve with topic branches

2019-03-11 Thread Faheem Mitha
Hi folks, I've been using Evolve for some time. One issue I've noticed is that if I've doing a lot of amends over a period of time, to a file or files, the rewriting mounts up quickly, because other commits get in the way. The other day it occurred to me that a way around this would be to do