All,
The OFA bugzilla has --254-- bugs whose status is resolved where for most of
them the resolution is fixed. The current time frame, just before the work
on OFED 1.3 starts, is a good period to have some house cleanup.
Basically, I think the way to go is that people would do a search on the
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:03:41AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
[...]
But I also see a serious problem with addressing: basically
git tracks content. It's not designed to track a bush
of branches taken together. For example, take tagging:
tag namespace is global, so you
Quoting Arthur Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] ANNOUNCE ofed backports for 2.6.22 kernel bits
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:03:41AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
[...]
But I also see a serious problem with addressing: basically
git tracks content.
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:09:09PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Arthur Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] ANNOUNCE ofed backports for 2.6.22 kernel bits
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:03:41AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Arthur Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] ANNOUNCE ofed backports for 2.6.22 kernel bits
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:32:28PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
[...]
For example, git pull can only merge one branch at a time.
how is this a
Quoting Arthur Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] ANNOUNCE ofed backports for 2.6.22 kernel bits
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:09:09PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Arthur Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] ANNOUNCE ofed
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:53:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
[...]
well, no, i _have_ been doing development on the
local branches in our internal repo. i also
merge in changes that you make to the ofed repo
to our internal backport branches. the script
i
Because you only have your driver to maintain.
no, i have to maintain quite a few of the
ofed backport branches as well for our release.
if i started getting pull requests from people
with changes to 15 backport branches in one go,
i'd probably want to script it...
Yea. Happens all the
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:19:24PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
i realize that you're attached to your current method,
but i've _used_ a different method, and i can say from
experience that it works _much_ better...
I'd like to see a clean method, that doesn't replace
i'd _really_ like to see a list of the advantages of
patches over branches. it's hard for me to know if
i'm just missing something if the case is not laid out...
Here's a short list off the top of my head
- A single git pull merges any number of backport changes
- A single git reset
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] ANNOUNCE ofed backports for 2.6.22 kernel bits
Here's a short list off the top of my head
- A single git pull merges any number of backport changes
- A single git reset ORIG_HEAD recovers from a conflicting merge
- A single
hi michael, ...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:52:20PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
i'd _really_ like to see a list of the advantages of
patches over branches. it's hard for me to know if
i'm just missing something if the case is not laid out...
thanks for the list...
Here's a short
12 matches
Mail list logo
