Sufficool, Stanley wrote:
Does anyone know a source for Windows initiators for iSER?
Currently, there's no open-source iSER initiator for Windows. However,
we (Voltaire) are working on it.
--
Erez Zilber | 972-9-971-7689
While running netperf and iperf over SDP I get unstable Performance
results.
On iperf I get more then 25 % difference between minimum and maximum.
On netperf I get the following amazing result. -
++
# while
OK, on a process level, my plan is to pull the current driver into a
neteffect branch in my git tree with the intention of merging it for
2.6.25. I'll let you know when that's ready (probably early next
week). I'll probably do some cleanups there, and you can send me
cleanup/fix patches
Hi Johann,
Please see my comments inside
Thanks,
Tziporet
On 10/23/07, *Johann George* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friday, November 16, 2007
-
07:15 45m Breakfast
08:00 30m
The MVAPICH team is pleased to announce the availability of MVAPICH
1.0-beta with the following NEW features:
- New OpenFabrics Gen2 Unreliable-Datagram (UD)-based design
for large-scale InfiniBand clusters (multi-thousand cores)
- delivers performance and scalability with constant
Tziporet,
We may need more then 30m for this
Also - is will be good that this session will be the last one, and then
I can put inside input from all sessions - especially those that speak
on the new features.
Since I knew that some people would miss the last few sessions due to
flight
Thanks for all the comments on the MPI sessions. Our primary interest
should be to make the MPI sessions as valuable as possible to the
audience that is attending. My allotment was based on discussion with
the presenters having decided to limit it to those MPIs that were
included as part of OFED
The MVAPICH team is pleased to announce the availability of MVAPICH
1.0-beta with the following NEW features:
- New OpenFabrics Gen2 Unreliable-Datagram (UD)-based design
for large-scale InfiniBand clusters (multi-thousand cores)
- delivers performance and scalability with constant
On 10/24/07, Johann George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your feedback. We can certainly expand, shorten and change
sessions around to maximize benefit for the attendees.
OK, so lets do it!
In short, the agenda as it is now, has a great bias to updates and
reporting windowz-staff
Or and Jeff,
Thanks again for your input. I like Or's idea of starting
the summit earlier but am concerned as to whether people
could attend. I'm also not sure we could have access to the
room earlier although I suspect that will be possible.
Regarding parallel tracks, we currently do not have
10 matches
Mail list logo
