Hi Stefan,
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:44:29 +0200 Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Before Paulus gets to you: Why are we doing this? Please write an
explanatory commit message.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROT
Stefan Roscher writes:
> This patchset contains two changes for IB/ehca and ibmebus.
>
> The first patch enables ibmebus_request_irq() to optionally return the
> IRQ number, which is used by the second patch to trigger EOI in case of
> lost interrupts.
At first sight it seems like a very bad i
eTrust Secure Content Manager SMTPMAIL could not deliver the e-mail below
because at least one of recipients was rejected by the mail server
Please check the recipients e-mail address before you try again:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message header:
===
X-eSCM-
> +if (desc->chip && desc->chip->eoi)
> +desc->chip->eoi(irq);
This doesn't seem like the type of thing a device driver should be
doing. Both patches are rather short on changelog text -- what is the
issue here and how does this fi
Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09.06.2008 17:44:29:
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ibmebus.c|5 -
> drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_eq.c |4 ++--
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c |6 +++---
> include/asm-p
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_classes.h |1 +
drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_eq.c |6 --
drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c| 12 ++--
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/ibmebus.c|5 -
drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_eq.c |4 ++--
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c |6 +++---
include/asm-powerpc/ibmebus.h|2 +-
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deleti
This patchset contains two changes for IB/ehca and ibmebus.
The first patch enables ibmebus_request_irq() to optionally return the
IRQ number, which is used by the second patch to trigger EOI in case of
lost interrupts.
They should apply cleanly against 2.6.26 git tree.
Thanks
Stefan
_
"Be smart, life is easy." (c) H. J. Wood
H. J. Wood had as many wemen in his life, as you can only imagine.
Reveal secretshttp://saidwarm.com/?said=nik
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Friday 06 June 2008 22:20, Dotan Barak wrote:
> I checked the code in the ehca driver and noticed that
> post RR to a QP is being accepted in any state (including the RESET state).
You're right, this is only consistent -- thanks for pointin
10 matches
Mail list logo