> Given that you seem to like the rest of the code and Jason hasn't spoken
> up yet, I think we can have Roland merge this patch. Roland, what do you
> think?
I don't see any problem with the idea and this does sound like a step
forward, so I am planning on merging this (pending review).
___
Hal Rosenstock wrote on 27.08.2009 15:31:40:
> I don't think it should be hard coded. IMO it would be better to default
to 18
> and somehow able to be adjusted (via a (dynamic) module parameter ?).
I don't see how making this a parameter would benefit any end user, while
on the other hand it c
