[ewg] ib_rdma test over chelsio

I have trouble to run ib_rdma test over chelsio. I got client reported pp_client_connect: unexpected CM event 1 error with or without any server running. The FW is 7.4.0. I tried stack 1.2.5 and ofed-1.4.1 both doesn't seem work to me. Anybody has any idea? Thanks Shirley

Re: [ewg] [PATCH] ipoib: avoid enabling napi when it's already enabled

在 2008-10-28二的 10:47 +0200，Vladimir Sokolovsky写道： Yossi Etigin wrote: ipoib_open() may be called from ipoib_pkey_poll(), after napi has already been enbaled, and try to enable it again. This triggers BUG_ON test in napi_enable(). Signed-off-by: Yossi Etigin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ewg] [PATCH] ipoib: avoid enabling napi when it's already enabled

We found the same problem during child interface test for ofed-1.4-rc3. Please help on fixing it in ofed-1.4 daily built. Thanks Shirley ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

[ewg] Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH v2] IB/ipoib: copy small SKBs in CM mode

Hello Eli, In this case, how many tx drop packets from ifconfig output? Should we see ifconfig tx drop packets + tx successfully transmit packets close to netperf packets? That's right. I am looking at ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc(), there is no tx drop packets increased in this situation,

Re: [ewg] Re: IPoIB panics on ipoib_cm_handle_rx_wc()

Hello Or, We have seen skb_under_panic() in our test enviornment as well. It's easy reproduce this with tcpdump on and off. thanks Shirley On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 14:11 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=989 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ewg] Re: [PATCH] IPoIB 4K MTU support

Hello Roland, On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 13:46 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Thanks, applied with some cleanups as below. Thanks! As an aside, in the case where we need to use a fragment in the receive skb, does it make sense to make the initial linear part bigger so the TCP and IP headers fit

[ewg] [PATCH] IPoIB 4K MTU support

or equal to HCA IB MTU size. The first buffer is for IPoIB header + GRH header. The second buffer is IPoIB payload, which is 4K-4. Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h | 50 +- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c| 86

[ewg] Re: [RFC][1/2] IPoIB UD 4K MTU support

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:36 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: + unsigned int max_ib_mtu; I don't see where this is ever set? - R. It is set in ipoib_main.c, ipoib_add_port() + if (!ib_query_port(hca, port, attr)) + priv-max_ib_mtu = ib_mtu_enum_to_int(attr.max_mtu);

[ewg] Re: 4K MTU patch to kernel 2.6.26

Hello Tziporet, Yes, that's I am working on. I am going on vacation next week, that's why I hesitated to submit this patch this week since I can't respond to the review comments on time. If submitting the patch on April.1 is too late, I can submit this patch by tomorrow. How do you think?

[ewg] [RFC][0/2] IPoIB UD 4K MTU support

Here is a patchset to enable IPoIB UD 4K MTU support for any IB fabric where the max IPoIB payload can be up to 4K. This patchset uses two S/G buffers when IPoIB payload + IB_GRH header size is greater than PAGE_SIZE. The first buffer size is IB_GRH_HEAD + IPOIB_ENCAP_LEN. The second buffer is the

[ewg] [RFC][1/2] IPoIB UD 4K MTU support

This patch defines some parameters and creates a couple of APIs and for UD RX S/G to be used later. Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h | 48 ++ 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[ewg] [RFC][2/2] IPoIB UD 4K MTU support

This patch enabled 4K MTU support for IPoIB UD. I fixed unnecessary define in [RFC][1/2] patch since there is only 2 buffers are needed. I will integrate any comments later for this patchset and resubmit it. I have touched test this patch for branch-2.6.25 git tree. Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma

Re: [ewg] [Fwd: Re: [ofa-general] IPOIB/CM increase retry counts]

I saw cases where a fast sender consumed the TX ring and I solved this by increasing the size of the tx queue. I will try to connect ConnectX with Sinai and see if there are such issues. Which indicates we really need to fix bug 907. Thanks

Re: [ewg] [PATCH]IPOIB/CM fix for bug# 906 -OFED-1.3

On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 10:04 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: Also here, does this problem exist in the 2.6.25-rc1 upstream code as well? from the change log I don't understand the source of the problem (only the symptom of failing to destroy ipoib/cm rx QP) and the solution. Or. I believe so.

[ewg] Re: IB/ipoib: ipoib_ib_post_receive: infinite loop in error path

Thanks Nam. I will fix it along with ipoib_sg_skb_put_frags() optimization. Thanks Shirley Hoang-Nam Nguyen

[ewg] Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib - Problem with latest OFED 1.3 build... IPoIB and iPATH

Hello Ralph, I looked at ehca and mthca, in create_ah(), both driver didn't check dlid condition check like ipath here. In the port initilizaiton, priv-local_lid is set to 0 which is created by ipoib_0190_unsig_udqp.patch in RC4. I will let Eli look at this problem. static struct

[ewg] ***SPAM*** Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib - Problem with latest OFED 1.3 build... IPoIB and iPATH

Hello Ralph, This patch looks OK to me. Let's wait for Eli's response. Thanks Shirley___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Re: [ewg] [Fwd: Re: [ofa-general] Problem with latest OFED 1.3 build... IPoIB and iPATH]

Hello Ralph, What's ifconfig ib0 output? We can reproduce the problem here. We haven't made any ib_ipath driver changes between RC3 and RC4 so some recent patch has broken us. I'm in the process of looking at it. On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 17:17 -0800, Arlin Davis wrote: I cannot

Re: [ewg] [Fwd: Re: [ofa-general] Problem with latest OFED 1.3 build... IPoIB and iPATH]

On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 18:16 -0800, Ralph Campbell wrote: # cat /etc/*release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga) # uname -r 2.6.18-8.el5 4K PAGE_SIZE I don't have ipath driver here. Otherwise I could try them out. A couple suggestions here, could you please try out? 1.

Re: [ewg] traffic jittery, send queue full reports from mthca driver

Hello Or, I found out that if you increase send_queue_size and recv_queue_size, like 1K, this problem will be gone. Thanks Shirley ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Re: [ewg] OFED 1.3 rc4 update

On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 18:25 +0200, Tziporet Koren wrote: Hi, We will have OFED 1.3-rc4 tomorrow after one more night of regression It will include: 1. IPoIB: Non-SRQ for CM mode 2. IPOIB: 4K MTU 3. IPoIB - Small messages improvements Note that today's latest build will

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

/05/08 08:19 AM Shirley Ma wrote: I

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

Hello Tziporet, On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 18:56 +0200, Tziporet Koren wrote: Shirley Ma wrote: Hello Tziporet, The problem was because of the last check in of small UDP performance patch. It changed the receiving path completely. And I only got less than one day to merge/test the patch

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/05/2008 12:07:28 PM: Please test on RHREL 5 too What are your stress tests? Ok. The stress test is similar to netperf/netserver. But it's bi-directional multiple streams. I have stressed the stream to 150, duplex running overnight. Please send

[ewg] [PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch for RC3 against 2.6.24

that would be nice. If this is any issue, I will ask Nam to help out. I have touch tested mthca for 2K MTU for the updated patch. More test are going on. thanks Shirley Signed-off-by Shirley Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h | 28 +++- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib

[ewg] Re: [PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch for RC3 against 2.6.24

Hello all, I have created the patch and tested without Eli's patch but with Pradeep's patch. It works OK. Then I create another patch with Eli and Pradeep's patch against today's ofed-1.3 git tree. The ping worked for a while then stopped. I will try to debug it. And We have found a crash in

[ewg] [PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

problem to create the backport patch, let me know. I will ask Nam to help. The attachment is for you to easily apply the patch, my email might have issues. Thanks Shirley Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff -urpN ofed_1_3_a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib.h ofed_1_3_b/drivers

Re: [ewg] Oops with today's OFED 1.3

Eli, Please look at this issues ASAP. Without your patch everything works well. Thanks Shirley ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

***SPAM*** Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Please send all patches for OFED 1.3 rc4 by end of Monday (Feb 4)

Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/04/2008 08:14:08 AM: OK - go ahead and regenerate patch and we will be able to include it in RC4 BTW - how did you test it with mthca? It does not support 4K MTU. You can test it with ConnectX since it does supports 4K MTU (with a special

[ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

I found one one line was out side for loop when merging this patch with current git-tree. This caused UD_POST_RCV_COUNT = 16 wrong. I have fixed it. This is the updated patch. Thanks Shirley Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff -urpN ofed_kernel_a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib

RE: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] OFED Jan 28 meeting summary on RC3readiness

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:10 -0800, Woodruff, Robert J wrote: Tziporet wrote, * Delay 1.3 release in a week * Do RC4 next week - Feb 6 * Add RC5 on Feb 18 - this will be the GOLD version * GA release on Feb 25 All - please reply if this is acceptable I hate to keep

RE: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] OFED Jan 28 meeting summary on RC3readiness

In addition, we should talk about how to integrate patches being queued in upper stream but not in OFED, like IPoIB noSRQ. There is always a window between OFED release and kernel release, a window between Distro release and OFED release. Some customers are targeted OFED release, some

Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Bonding and hw_csum

Hello Eli, ipoib_0030_hw_csum.patch has been removed Would removing this patch cause any errors on applying the rest of patches? If not, I will remove it for our testing as well. Thanks Shirley ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org

Re: [ewg] Re: non SRQ patch for OFED 1.3

Pradeep, We tries to apply this patch for OFED 1.3 and its breaks some of the backports. Please use the makedist script on the ofa server (there is an explanation in the developers Wiki) and fix this so we can try to apply it Vlad will help you later today too Thanks, Tziporet Thanks

Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] OFED Jan 28 meeting summary on RC3readiness

Thanks for everyone here. I appreciate your comments and effort. The big challenge for us is how to sync features/blockers with OFED release Distros release. Most of our customers prefer Distros release so they can get same level of support as other pieces. If OFED could work with Distros

Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] OFED Jan 28 meeting summary on RC3 readiness

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/30/2008 08:40:10 AM: Doug Ledford wrote: Hmmm...I'd like to put my $.02 in here. I don't have any visibility into what drives the OFED schedule, so I have no clue as to why people don't want to slip the schedule for this change. I'm sure you guys have

[ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Bonding and hw_csum

Hello Tziporet, the hw checksum patch was removed from OFED 1.3 Tziporet Could youp please specify which patch has been removed? I still can see a list of patches under RC3. here they are: ipoib_0010_Add-high-dma-support-to-ipoib.patch ipoib_0020_Add-s-g-support-for-IPOIB.patch