Or Gerlitz ogerl...@voltaire.com wrote:
Tziporet, any reason not to wait till this core patch is accepted to the
mainline kernel?
Vlad, Tziporet, any reason not to address my question, silently ignore my
email and just pull this without acking as you usually do, what's the story
behind that?!
Sokolovsky
Cc: Ralph Campbell; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] [PATCH] IB/qib: latest QIB driver fixes
Or Gerlitz ogerl...@voltaire.com wrote:
Tziporet, any reason not to wait till this core patch is accepted to the
mainline kernel?
Vlad, Tziporet, any reason not to address my
Betsy Zeller wrote:
the agreement in Sonoma was that anything submitted to OFED should
also be in the process of going into the kernel.
what prevents you from sending a reminder to Roland?
Or.
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
No reason not to wait unless it goes beyond OFED-1.5
ship date. I don't think waiting until the last minute
is a good idea. Note that this interface is between ib_qib
and ib_core so if the final form accepted upstream is
different, it can be changed without impact since the kernel
modules are all
Ralph Campbell wrote:
I don't think this is likely to happen since it fixes Roland's original concern
with exporting struct ib_port
whatever, still its a patch to the core that adds new API, etc, needs to
pass the maintainer acceptance. Its been two weeks since you sent v2, so
a kindly
Ralph Campbell wrote:
Vlad, please pull from
Ralph, Tziporet, any reason not to wait till this core patch is accepted
to the mainline kernel?
Or.
commit 840bbefeda26d21bffae6b7cdc88e981fcfb0a45
Author: Ralph Campbell (QLogic) ral...@hosting.openfabrics.org
Date: Mon Nov 30 14:09:34
