ere
> have been major improvements in the stack since 1.4.2. Also please be
> sure that you update the firmware in all hardware for the same reason.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Rupert
>
>
>
>
> From: koen_seg...@computacenter.com
> [mailt
rics.org
Cc: koen_seg...@computacenter.com
Subject: RE: [ewg] 200m cable results in slower rdma read performance? [
CC Anti-Virus checked ]
Rupert,
Thanks for replying.
Below is the output of the ibdiagnet command.
I don't see any issues here. Just tell me if you need more info.
I
...@computacenter.com
Subject: RE: [ewg] 200m cable results in slower rdma read performance? [ CC
Anti-Virus checked ]
Rupert,
Thanks for replying.
Below is the output of the ibdiagnet command.
I don't see any issues here. Just tell me if you need more info.
I forgot to mention that we are
penfabrics.org] On Behalf Of
koen_seg...@computacenter.com
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 3:22 AM
To: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: [ewg] 200m cable results in slower rdma read performance? [ CC
Anti-Virus checked ]
Hi,
In my test setup I have 3 servers of which 2 are residing in
, October 17, 2011 3:22 AM
To: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: [ewg] 200m cable results in slower rdma read performance? [ CC
Anti-Virus checked ]
Hi,
In my test setup I have 3 servers of which 2 are residing in Datacenter1 and
the other in Datacenter2.
If I do a rdma test between
Hi,
In my test setup I have 3 servers of which 2 are residing in Datacenter1
and the other in Datacenter2.
If I do a rdma test between datacenters, I get a much lower performance
than if I would do the test between servers residing in the same
datacenter.
DC1: gpfsprod1n1, gpfsprod1n3
