Message-
From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ewg-
boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Marciniszyn, Mike
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 7:51 AM
To: Elken, Tom; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Interop test failure using OFED-3.5 RC4
This is definitely
[mailto:ewg-
boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Marciniszyn, Mike
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 7:51 AM
To: Elken, Tom; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Interop test failure using OFED-3.5 RC4
This is definitely a perftest bug.
This is a significant re-write
: [ewg] Interop test failure using OFED-3.5 RC4
This is definitely a perftest bug.
This is a significant re-write of these utilities and this bug is a
regression in the routine ctx_set_out_reads().
In 1.4 the code
] On Behalf Of Marciniszyn, Mike
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 7:51 AM
To: Elken, Tom; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Interop test failure using OFED-3.5 RC4
This is definitely a perftest bug.
This is a significant re-write of these utilities and this bug
-
From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ewg-
boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Marciniszyn, Mike
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 7:51 AM
To: Elken, Tom; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Interop test failure using OFED-3.5 RC4
This is definitely
We have investigated and found that perftest was upgraded from v1.8 to v2.0
Tom, I was mistaken. The older perftest version is 1.4.
Mike
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Tom wrote,
The EWG standard practice is that if a significant bug fix goes in, we would
need another RC to enable others to easily test it.
But perhaps it depends on whether the bug is in perftest, qib or elsewhere.
In any case, we don't want a GA build until this issue is solved.
Yes,
This is definitely a perftest bug.
This is a significant re-write of these utilities and this bug is a regression
in the routine ctx_set_out_reads().
In 1.4 the code is this:
/**
*
On 1/11/2013 7:20 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
We have investigated and found that perftest was upgraded from v1.8 to v2.0
on 11/19/12, between RC3 and RC4.
Hi,
We did move from perftest-1.4 to perftest-2.0 last month.
It has the same logic and results as the older version + plenty of new
features.
] Interop test failure using OFED-3.5 RC4
This is definitely a perftest bug.
This is a significant re-write of these utilities and this bug is a regression
in the routine ctx_set_out_reads().
In 1.4 the code
Mellanox to this thread.
Woody
-Original Message-
From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ewg-
boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Marciniszyn, Mike
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 7:51 AM
To: Elken, Tom; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Interop test failure
Of Marciniszyn, Mike
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 7:51 AM
To: Elken, Tom; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Interop test failure using OFED-3.5 RC4
This is definitely a perftest bug.
This is a significant re-write of these utilities and this bug is a regression
in the
routine
Rupert and the UNH-IOL pointed out that an Interop test which uses the
ib_read_bw (perftest) benchmark fails on Intel True Scale HCAs.
This test was succeeding with RC2, and started failing with RC3. I am sorry
that
our QA team did not find this bug with RC3.
We have investigated and
Rupert and the UNH-IOL pointed out that an Interop test which uses the
ib_read_bw (perftest) benchmark fails on Intel True Scale HCAs.
This test was succeeding with RC2, and started failing with RC3. I am sorry
that our QA team did not find this bug with RC3.
We have investigated and found
We have investigated and found that perftest was upgraded from v1.8 to v2.0
on 11/19/12, between RC3 and RC4.
Er, I meant between RC2 and RC3.
Why would there be a _major_ version change in any component done in the middle
of a release cycle?!
15 matches
Mail list logo
