RDS – GA with RDMA API - wrong, RDS patches are now on hold for 1.4 such
that 1.4.1 is a must just in that sense
GA with RDMA API is already done over IB.
I don't agree. Andy, can you comment?
My understanding is that the stable RDS code is present at the 1.3.x
tree but this code is also
See below
Or Gerlitz wrote:
Woodruff, Robert J wrote:
Attached are the 0.3 version of the BOF slides that we can review today.
slide 11 (1.4 features) says
RDS – GA with RDMA API - wrong, RDS patches are now on hold for 1.4
such that 1.4.1 is a must just in that sense
Congestion
Or Gerlitz wrote:
slide 11 (1.4 features) says
RDS – GA with RDMA API - wrong, RDS patches are now on hold for 1.4
such that 1.4.1 is a must just in that sense
GA with RDMA API is already done over IB
RDS patches on hold are those that supports iWARP.
Congestion Control in ibutils - can
Woodruff, Robert J wrote:
Attached are the 0.3 version of the BOF slides that we can review today.
slide 11 (1.4 features) says
RDS – GA with RDMA API - wrong, RDS patches are now on hold for 1.4
such that 1.4.1 is a must just in that sense
Congestion Control in ibutils - can someone
Attached are the 0.3 version of the BOF slides that we can
review today.
Please change the reference to NetEffect on slide 5 to Intel. Intel recently
acquired NetEffect assets.
Thanks,
Chien
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Hi Woody,
On 09:23 Wed 22 Oct , Woodruff, Robert J wrote:
Attached are the 0.3 version of the BOF slides that we can
review today.
On slide 11.
ibnetdiscover library idea was only briefly reviewed in OFED-1.4 period.
It didn't enter OFED-1.4.
Sasha
I'm not sure if my speaker phone is malfunctioning. I just want to
mention that on slide 11 mvapich2 1.2 is the actually release and not
mvapich2 1.1. Also, there are a couple typos such as Fedore (instead of
Fedora) on slide 12. Is Fedora still going by Fedora Core? Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 22,
